Is variance too powerful to overcome at 100nl ?

[BigCummins]

Am i the only one whose looked at this thread like 10x just to see that graph?

[StarkNaked]

man, if i was that bad, i wouldn't have PT installed so i would have no idea how crappy my graph looks!

[sh58]

y don't you show us your PT stats. let me guess 100/100/100..........

[ocdscale]

[ QUOTE ]
lol lol lol

if variance was so big at 100nl, theres no way there would be so many player that have destroyed it

[/ QUOTE ]

This is very wrong, DUCY?

Not saying OP is any good though.

[DaveyDonk]

This can't even be real, can it??? It looks like a limit graph, over like 250 hands of HU, lol.

[fsista]

Yea this is clearly variance, move to party 400$NL where they respect your raises.

[Go_Blue88]

I really hope this isn't real. Quit poker...jesus [censored] christ...

[JOHANSON YO]

you should probably quit soon.

[Kjell201]

This can't be a graph from only $100. 63k-70k gotta be somewhere else.

If you did what you did 0-60k with rakeback, you'd be making some sort of money (not much).

Anyway, fun thread.

[juggler97531]

[ QUOTE ]

Iam solid winning poker player. Unfortunately variance is just too much for me. I cant take it anymore.


[/ QUOTE ]

try running it twice to reduce variance.

Also i use very nice software to reduce variance.
Here is twoplustwo thread on this:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...;gonew=1#UNREAD