|
|
#41
05-07-2007, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
to say 20 BI+ at 100nl is impossibe is ignorant, to say people are ignorant to believe its not a pure downswing is ignorant.
You can lose 20BI+ at 100nl playing well, but it's going to take place over a larger number of hands, like 25k. 
|
|
#43
05-07-2007, 01:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
Firstly, OP sux.
Secondly, I'm excited to read your BBV post about insane beats you take 100k hands from now. Finally, if you have a BR of 40 quarters ($10) and everytime you flip heads you make 1q + 1 cent and tails you lose 1q there is a VERY high chance your bankroll will drop below $5. And this is a 4% edge! So STFU cause you know nothing about variance. Again. OP Sux cause NL100 is silly.
|
|
#45
05-07-2007, 01:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
so are people going to view this differently when I post the 2 days it took me to get out? you people must be nits and playing 2 years ago to not think this is pretty standard playing 36/30/5 no matter how good you play
|
|
#46
05-07-2007, 01:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
[ QUOTE ]
so are people going to view this differently when I post the 2 days it took me to get out? you people must be nits and playing 2 years ago to not think this is pretty standard playing 36/30/5 no matter how good you play [/ QUOTE ] thats what i play sir
|
|
#48
05-07-2007, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so are people going to view this differently when I post the 2 days it took me to get out? you people must be nits and playing 2 years ago to not think this is pretty standard playing 36/30/5 no matter how good you play [/ QUOTE ] thats what i play sir [/ QUOTE ] well ikestoys I've always respected your posts and everything but I'm not gonna go out of my way to somehow try and prove that I played good through all of this - the whole 'omg I have so many leaks, need to plug' was addressed after the downswing prior to the one posted here
|
|
#49
05-07-2007, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] so are people going to view this differently when I post the 2 days it took me to get out? you people must be nits and playing 2 years ago to not think this is pretty standard playing 36/30/5 no matter how good you play [/ QUOTE ] thats what i play sir [/ QUOTE ] well ikestoys I've always respected your posts and everything but I'm not gonna go out of my way to somehow try and prove that I played good through all of this - the whole 'omg I have so many leaks, need to plug' was addressed after the downswing prior to the one posted here [/ QUOTE ] Won't be able to, but I don't see why you can say, "Yeah, I wasn't playing my best" Taking responsibilities for your results is key in poker
|
|
#50
05-07-2007, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Reasonable NL$100 Downswing (for the ignorant)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] so are people going to view this differently when I post the 2 days it took me to get out? you people must be nits and playing 2 years ago to not think this is pretty standard playing 36/30/5 no matter how good you play [/ QUOTE ] thats what i play sir [/ QUOTE ] well ikestoys I've always respected your posts and everything but I'm not gonna go out of my way to somehow try and prove that I played good through all of this - the whole 'omg I have so many leaks, need to plug' was addressed after the downswing prior to the one posted here [/ QUOTE ] Won't be able to, but I don't see why you can say, "Yeah, I wasn't playing my best" Taking responsibilities for your results is key in poker [/ QUOTE ] Who is your avatar a picture of?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
