Gigabet's hand histories

[mannerbot]

I did not read the initial prop bet thread in time to participate, but would really like to do so (and see the hand histories, of course). While I understand that it's too late to get in at this point, I was wondering if anyone would care to allow me to share a piece of a bet with him. For example, if someone that bought a $100 share would allow me to buy a half share for $50, I would really appreciate it.

If not, of course I will understand. But if it is possible I would like to be a part of this (only if lacky is alright with my doing so, of course).

[davehwm]

[ QUOTE ]
but the "problem with Gigabet" isn't Gigabet it's the fanboy OMG IT IS GIGA!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

FWIW, I think the Gigabet haters that troll every Gigabet thread have become worse than the Gigabet fanboys.

[New York Jet]

[ QUOTE ]
I did not read the initial prop bet thread in time to participate, but would really like to do so (and see the hand histories, of course). While I understand that it's too late to get in at this point, I was wondering if anyone would care to allow me to share a piece of a bet with him. For example, if someone that bought a $100 share would allow me to buy a half share for $50, I would really appreciate it.

If not, of course I will understand. But if it is possible I would like to be a part of this (only if lacky is alright with my doing so, of course).

[/ QUOTE ]
I think there are quite a few posters in the same situation. I too missed the boat.

[Flight_Risk]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I did not read the initial prop bet thread in time to participate, but would really like to do so (and see the hand histories, of course). While I understand that it's too late to get in at this point, I was wondering if anyone would care to allow me to share a piece of a bet with him. For example, if someone that bought a $100 share would allow me to buy a half share for $50, I would really appreciate it.

If not, of course I will understand. But if it is possible I would like to be a part of this (only if lacky is alright with my doing so, of course).

[/ QUOTE ]
I think there are quite a few posters in the same situation. I too missed the boat.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cosign.

Flight_Risk

[SuitedSixes]

Why does every post with 'Gigabet' in the title turn into a mess?

[Yeti]

Why is he playing the $11s and $22s?

[1C5]

[cocarondelle]

Damn I didn t laugh like this for a long time
tx

[The once and future king]

Did Giga actualy beat the 20s? He didnt beat the 10s (though he obviously can I cant emphasis enough, this is not a haters or a fanbois post)

Just a thought but can you learn as much from HHs that are associated with a period of negative ROI. Wont it be hard to escape from results orientated thinking?

I can see the value in HHs for maybe 50s+ but I dont think Giga had the time to adjust "downwards" for at least the 10s because (sorry fanbois) he is only human and not the coming of the poker messiah and I think he needed more than X games at the 10s to fully make his actual dominance (75% ROI?) felt.

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
Paul- I personally think it would be against the spirit of the bet for you to post Hand Histories from Gigabet without his and/or Lacky's permission. Some people paid the $100 to specifically see the more interesting hands, as was pointed out. But beyond that, I think it would break the spirit of the bet to give the hands out to others. I personally have no problem with it at all (I paid the $100 to get access to the HH's as well), but I think you should ask Gigabet and Lacky if that breaks the spirit of the wager.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree we should go with whatever Lacky/GB's wishes are on this, and I'll abide by whatever the forum decides. But personally I think it goes against the spirit of this board not to post some HHs here for lively, constructive debate. And I have a feeling, given the openness of GB so far to share his HHs and use his real username, that he may feel the same.

Not trying to ruffle any feathers, but that's my vote.