![]() |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know if your question about which stats was answered, but whichever ones you find the most telling would answer two questions. Which ones and what should you strive to keep them at?
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if your question about which stats was answered, but whichever ones you find the most telling would answer two questions. Which ones and what should you strive to keep them at? [/ QUOTE ] Okay, I think the positional stats may be the most telling of all: These are my stats for NL10, 25, 50, and 100 6-max. ![]() |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
... and what should you strive to keep them at? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure I can answer a "what should you strive to keep them at" question correctly. The only general thing to strive for is to be a winning player. Whether you do that as a TAG, LAG or by being a nit like me, is up to you and what you feel comfortable with. I tried to play more LAGgy for a while, but I just didn't feel comfortable and lost a bunch of money. So I returned to nittsville, and I feel great about that. My goal is to get that BB/hand up towards around .1 per hand, and reducing my WTSD percentage to around 22-24ish (currently I'm around 25, the 27 reflects my even worse calling station days from NL10 and NL25). This means I have to find some high value folds on the way, which in turn means, I have to think a lot more & deeper and read hands better. That should be challenging enough. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ... and what should you strive to keep them at? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure I can answer a "what should you strive to keep them at" question correctly. The only general thing to strive for is to be a winning player. Whether you do that as a TAG, LAG or by being a nit like me, is up to you and what you feel comfortable with. I tried to play more LAGgy for a while, but I just didn't feel comfortable and lost a bunch of money. So I returned to nittsville, and I feel great about that. My goal is to get that BB/hand up towards around .1 per hand, and reducing my WTSD percentage to around 22-24ish (currently I'm around 25, the 27 reflects my even worse calling station days from NL10 and NL25). This means I have to find some high value folds on the way, which in turn means, I have to think a lot more & deeper and read hands better. That should be challenging enough. [/ QUOTE ] Can you PM me with your SN at FTP so I can ghost you? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
who would you like to see in the Fishtank next?
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
who would you like to see in the Fishtank next? [/ QUOTE ] I think Munkey would be an awesome candidate, as would be MannyIsGod or, of course, our "mod of the people" EMcWilliams. Or simply anyone who's either in the transition to NL100 or just about to move up. Still fishy, but able to bite back. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
who would you like to see in the Fishtank next? [/ QUOTE ] Orange, and its not even close. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] who would you like to see in the Fishtank next? [/ QUOTE ] Orange, and its not even close. [/ QUOTE ] I did a well already, so ill sit this one out. But ill defintaly ask orange. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
...and flame me - Justine Henin. [/ QUOTE ] Come on, now you're just being silly. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
okay. i'll do it after kazana is done with his.
|
![]() |
|
|