Making a run

[kslghost]

Hhahaha you both suck! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] You didn't need the trips anyways.

[AScorz]

[ QUOTE ]
Hhahaha you both suck! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] You didn't need the trips anyways.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, but my balls dropped out of my stomach when it hit.

[Paul Thomson]

gl.

i suggest that you don't make high varience play but also don't play scared.

[AScorz]

[ QUOTE ]
gl.

i suggest that you don't make high varience play but also don't play scared.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ha! That post came alittle to late.

[True]

ummmmm people call at 400nl with AKo all in pf :s

true

[yad]

wow that hand you posted is terrible. good thing you quit, you would have busted within the next 15 minutes.

[tannenj]

[ QUOTE ]
wow that hand you posted is terrible. good thing you quit, you would have busted within the next 15 minutes.

[/ QUOTE ]

agree, that play is MAJOR -EV. know that you made a blockhead move by putting 1/3 of your roll on the table, but got away with it.

[kitaristi0]

In all seriousness,

[ QUOTE ]
You'd have probably been better off in the long run if you would have lost your buyin rather than double it up.

[/ QUOTE ]

couldn't agree more.

But wtf people where's the support? He just increased his bankroll by 33% in one fell swoop. If this was BBV he would receive high praise (ok not really since sitting at NL400 with 1/3 of your br when you could sit at NL2k is about the most unballa thing in recent memory but w/e).

[Tickner]

It stupid, yeah, but if your willing to drop to 25nl if you (when you) fail then its no biggie. Technically you are playing on a 33 buyin roll if you stop as soon as you lose $400 and start playin strictly $25nl. The problem lies in the fact that this is a very high risk proposition and actually dropping to $25nl after playing for $400 is something no1 wants to do. Be prepared to go busto several times before you smarten up.

And GL!