#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Limp QQ UTG has to be too weak.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
According to my database its EV+ for me. Maybe its my poor post flop skill. I might limp reraise with QQ depending on how many callers and who the raiser is.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
I limp all pairs up to QQ in FR UTG. [/ QUOTE ] I don't know how much more of this thread I can take. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
According to my database its EV+ for me. [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure it is, but I'll bet that raising is more +EV. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Why?
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
They present the idea that in limit play open limping is almost never correct b/c of blind steal concerns but in NL you can often more profitably play limped pots against the blinds than raised ones [/ QUOTE ] I'm curious about this advice in the book since in every game I've played (or any game I can think of) open limping in late position is beyond bad. I don't play fr so I can't be sure how profitable open limping pp's from EP is compared to open raising them but I seriously doubt open limping is much better (if at all) unless table conditions really force it. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
Why? [/ QUOTE ] because you win many more pots (and bigger ones) |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
Maybe but I loose many semi big pots by raising, where I have put in 4BB preflop and 10BB on the flop. Maybe its due to bad timed C-bets and poor post flop skill.
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
It looks like that its the 6 max guys who advocate raising and we FR nits who limp.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Theory - EP in Full Ring
[ QUOTE ]
It looks like that its the 6 max guys who advocate raising and we FR nits who limp. [/ QUOTE ] Johan, What are your FR stats? |
|
|