Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:32 PM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
True, but throughout his career he had 7 seasons of 40+ out of the 23 seasons he played.

[/ QUOTE ]

Three of those Seven 40+ HR seasons after age 35. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:34 PM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
Aaron was also aided in playing his later years in ATL Fulton County stadium vs Bonds playing in prolly THE toughest park to hit home runs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I appreciate the Park Effects as related to home run production, I really do.

I just don't make the heaping leap of logic to use them as conclusive evidence that someone used steroids.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:36 PM
lozen lozen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Great White North
Posts: 2,071
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

One thing no one seems to mention Babe Ruth was an arshole also and considered to be a jerk. Now we look at him as one of the greatest. I doubt Babe Ruth could even play in todays game. Steroids are not one of the greatest hitters but I still thing he's a jerk Next Question
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:40 PM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

Home Run Totals 35 and beyond
Aaron
Age 35:44
Age 36:38
Age 37:47
Age 38:34
Age 39:40
Age 40:20

Bonds
Age 35:49
Age 36: 73!!!
Age 37:46
Age 38:45
Age 39:45
Age 40: 42 AB's 5 HR's

I think it has got to be the 73 number that really works against him...thats just utterly ridiculous.

edit:maybe if that 73 was something like 44 I'd be singing a different tune, but you can't deny that it really casts a suspicious shadow over everything he did in those years. Generally,where there's smoke there's fire, and that's a WHOLE LOTTA smoke.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:40 PM
Athos Athos is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 76
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

"I just don't make the heaping leap of logic to use them as conclusive evidence that someone used steroids."

Agreed. That just makes what Bonds has done all the more impressive (Candlestick + PAC?!).
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:45 PM
MuresanForMVP MuresanForMVP is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: out there
Posts: 2,706
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

I'm sorry but looking back on this thread I can't help but feel that this is warranted (I'm very guilty too)...

Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:53 PM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
Why not do the totals for others suspected of juicing like sosa and mcgwire?

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, let's do that!

<u>Sammy Sosa</u>
Ages 30-34: 53 HRs per year
Ages 35-36*: 25 HRs per year (*retired age 37)

50% DECREASE!!
Career High: Age 29

<u>Mark McGwire</u>

Ages 31-34: 55 HRs per year
Ages 35-37: 42 HRs per year (retired age 38)

25% DECREASE!!
Carrer High: Age 34


<u>Production decreased ages 35-39 from ages 30-34:</u>
Caminiti, Canseco, McGwire and Sosa.

<u>Production *increased* ages 35-39 from ages 30-34:</u>
Bonds and Aaron.

<u>Career High before age 35:</u>
Canseco, Caminiti, McGwire, Sosa

<u>Career High after age 35:</u>
Bonds and Aaron.

So much for the theory that an increase in production after age 35 can only be accomplished through steroids! Aaron did it, and known steroid users had the OPPOSITE EFFECT!!

Bonds stats closely mirror Aarons in this regard, and completely run opposite of known steroid users!!!
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:57 PM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
I think it has got to be the 73 number that really works against him...thats just utterly ridiculous.

edit:maybe if that 73 was something like 44 I'd be singing a different tune, but you can't deny that it really casts a suspicious shadow over everything he did in those years. Generally,where there's smoke there's fire, and that's a WHOLE LOTTA smoke.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wonder what you would have thought if you were around when the Babe hit 60?

Yes, 73 is alot. Yes, 73 was amazing. At that time, 60 was even moreso in relation to what other guys were hitting at that time, and in and of itself an amazing total does not immedietaly mean "something must be up".

If that is the logic, then you must surely think the Babe cheated, huh? I surely hope not!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 05-11-2006, 02:57 PM
wisehandpoker wisehandpoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: twoplustwo
Posts: 2,326
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

And for reference, let's look at admitted steroid users comparative numbers, and see how they fared after age 35:

<u>Ken Caminiti</u>
ages 30-34: 24 HRs per year
ages 35-38: 18 HRs per year

25% decrease.
Career High: Age 33 !!

<u>Jose Canseco</u>
ages 30-34: 31 HRs per year
ages 35-36: 13 HRs per year

58% decrease.
Career High: Age 33 !!!


[/ QUOTE ]

This stuff right here means nothing.

Ever hear of injuries? And Jose was on roids when he was 30...so...wtf? As was Caminitti I believe.

[/ QUOTE ]

prohorn, a lot of those injuries were likely steroid residue
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 05-11-2006, 03:03 PM
prohornblower prohornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning the hockey-stop.
Posts: 8,016
Default Re: What do other pros think about Bonds?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

And for reference, let's look at admitted steroid users comparative numbers, and see how they fared after age 35:

<u>Ken Caminiti</u>
ages 30-34: 24 HRs per year
ages 35-38: 18 HRs per year

25% decrease.
Career High: Age 33 !!

<u>Jose Canseco</u>
ages 30-34: 31 HRs per year
ages 35-36: 13 HRs per year

58% decrease.
Career High: Age 33 !!!


[/ QUOTE ]

This stuff right here means nothing.

Ever hear of injuries? And Jose was on roids when he was 30...so...wtf? As was Caminitti I believe.

[/ QUOTE ]

prohorn, a lot of those injuries were likely steroid residue

[/ QUOTE ]

I know that. What is your point?

My point is that this guy isn't taking into account games played in those seasons.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.