|
|
|
|
#1
10-17-2007, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
*** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
TEN @ HOU 1:00 PM
TB @ DET 1:00 PM ATL @ NO 1:00 PM BAL @ BUF 1:00 PM SF @ NYG 1:00 PM ARI @ WAS 1:00 PM NE @ MIA 1:00 PM 
|
|
#2
10-18-2007, 12:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
2u on Wash -7. I'm a Wash homer, but coming off of another game where they dominated but failed to put the Packers away, the Redskins have "something to prove." On top of that, their defense is playing spectacularly, and Tim Rattay is awful. Line has already moved to -8.5 on some books.
|
|
#3
10-18-2007, 12:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
Also considering betting (or maybe wonging?) tampa (currently +2.5 on bodog)
|
|
#4
10-18-2007, 01:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
im in for 300 under 35 on blat/buff
and 200 on parlay w the under 35 and -3 balt good balt d vs bad buff o and their qb situation and kyle boller doesnt exactly excite me either this is going to be close tho. 35 is pretty low.
|
|
#5
10-18-2007, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
im staying clear of wash game.
rattay looked bad but he wasnt ready to play as a 2nd stringer he has been nearly as bad as last wks numbers. and ariz doesnt play badly on the road. thinking maybe the no/ atl game. gotta think about that one
|
|
#7
10-19-2007, 12:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
thinking maybe the no/ atl game. gotta think about that one [/ QUOTE ] Well I guess your thoughts are different than mine because I think this line is really inflated. NO has won one game this year(and Seattle really lost that more than NO won)and now they lay 8? On what basis, last weeks Sun & Mon night games? I'll be on the Falcons.
|
|
#8
10-18-2007, 05:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
[ QUOTE ]
im in for 300 under 35 on blat/buff and 200 on parlay w the under 35 and -3 balt good balt d vs bad buff o and their qb situation and kyle boller doesnt exactly excite me either this is going to be close tho. 35 is pretty low. [/ QUOTE ] Eek, I dunno. Ravens are 0-3 against the spread on the road this year, Buffalo 3-0 against the spread at home. The Bills won one of those games and lost the other two to last second FG's. Ravens are insanely overrated in my opinion, they could easily be 2-4. They haven't played one team who has a record over .500 and they barely squeeked out victories against the Cardinals, 49'ers and Jets. Also Trent Edwards is the guy in Buffalo, and he's looked decent. I wouldn't be concerned about him giving the ball away much, especially against a Baltimore secondary that hasn't been as sharp this year. Lynch has been solid too. Baltimore's offense is abysmal at best. I'd take Buffalo +3 here.
|
|
#9
10-18-2007, 05:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
i agree bout balt being overrated.
their offense w boller is pretty weak id agree that edwards isnt bad. prob better than losman but buff offense still anemic enough for me. they def played some good teams so far but a max of 2 offensive td's coming vs a wk njets teams is enough for me dunno either way this is a small edge. i was thinking spread would be -4.5 and when i saw -3 i was in.
|
|
#10
10-19-2007, 11:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** OFFICIAL 10/21/07 NFL EARLY GAME THREAD ***
It's sounding more and more like Warner is going to start despite his injury. I picked up WAS -325 earlier in the week when the line was just beginning to move. I'm not sure whether I should stick with it or just take the arb with ARI +340 or so. I expect the line to move back a bit over the next day.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
