#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Perception of a BBV poster
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] In sum, you are more than welcome to rag on posters... [/ QUOTE ] Therein, may lie the problem [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I see no problem with some lighthearted jabs, like the kind of stuff diebitter gets about wanting to make 500 new forums. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
I've never been one of the "Ban them - ban them all" brigade. I can't remember perma-banning anyone that wasn't an obvious spammer.
Although I've often been the target of RJ's venom-spitting, I'm with you on this, in a way. I think I'd like him to receive a "painful" ban - say fourteen days - with a serious warning that he is hanging by a very thin thread, and he will get at least a month's ban, if not a perma-ban, for any future obvious infraction of civil posting protocol. It would be imperative that he shouldn't be allowed to post under any other name, so perhaps a temporary ip ban might also be in order, if we decided this was a reasonable route to travel? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
[ QUOTE ]
I've never been one of the "Ban them - ban them all" brigade. I can't remember perma-banning anyone that wasn't an obvious spammer. Although I've often been the target of RJ's venom-spitting, I'm with you on this, in a way. I think I'd like him to receive a "painful" ban - say fourteen days - with a serious warning that he is hanging by a very thin thread, and he will get at least a month's ban, if not a perma-ban, for any future obvious infraction of civil posting protocol. It would be imperative that he shouldn't be allowed to post under any other name, so perhaps a temporary ip ban might also be in order, if we decided this was a reasonable route to travel? [/ QUOTE ] i don't know if it matters, but my opinion would be a last chance via a 2 week ban (no alias posting), with the understanding he has to stop the *unsolicited* personal attacks on his return. everyone has the right to defend themselves, but this latest thread was him being obtrusive. humans being incinerated is something that hits a bit too close for me because i am jewish, but is still an awful thing to say/wish on anyone. he was not addressing the post, just attacking. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
so he is still posting in bbv
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
[ QUOTE ]
does he have any points here? if not, we'll make the ban permanent [/ QUOTE ] That RJ hasn't been banned yet probably indicates that he's right and things could be done better. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] does he have any points here? if not, we'll make the ban permanent [/ QUOTE ] That RJ hasn't been banned yet probably indicates that he's right and things could be done better. [/ QUOTE ] so you think that rj is right in this PM? [ QUOTE ] this is a joke right? so its cool for moderators to make terrible posts in the wrong forum and flame someone when they that out? and if i say anything back im banned? this site is turning into such a joke. there is a reason i want to be a mod and its so the worst decisions ive ever seen in my life stop happening weekly with you guys. what a [censored] crock of [censored]. who banned me anyways? what an absolutely absurd decision. i am completely disgusted that you allow such complete morons to run your site. [/ QUOTE ] i guess you are either a good frien of rj's (nothing wrong with that), or you believe that complete morons are indeed running the site. hmm, maybe i knew what i was saying when i made that nasty comment to you. <------------takeback edit** |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
GM,
stop being a [censored] [censored] already. you completely misunderstood his [censored] post. also none of us care that you are [censored] jewish, it has nothing to do with the issue, take you sensitivities light them on fire and stick them up your transvestite ass |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
kma [censored]
i apparently misunderstood |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
A pole.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: from pittm
[ QUOTE ]
a better pole... [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|