simple preflop vs Matusow

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
WOW this is weird...i happily felt AQ vs aggressive regs at 400nl and 600nl, especially when they overpush on my 3-bets. So HEADS UP at at much bigger stakes vs a spewy aggro opponent, it should be very standard to felt here no?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, every player at 50-100 and higher is just weak tight and scared money. KOD's lucky he doesn't have to deal with all the aggression at $400 NL

[FionnMac]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WOW this is weird...i happily felt AQ vs aggressive regs at 400nl and 600nl, especially when they overpush on my 3-bets. So HEADS UP at at much bigger stakes vs a spewy aggro opponent, it should be very standard to felt here no?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, every player at 50-100 and higher is just weak tight and scared money. KOD's lucky he doesn't have to deal with all the aggression at $400 NL

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what i meant was i would expect $50/$100nl to be WAY more aggressive than midstakes, especially hu. Which is why i can't fathom folding. So what are you saying you'd do here FWF?

[FoxwoodsFiend]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WOW this is weird...i happily felt AQ vs aggressive regs at 400nl and 600nl, especially when they overpush on my 3-bets. So HEADS UP at at much bigger stakes vs a spewy aggro opponent, it should be very standard to felt here no?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, every player at 50-100 and higher is just weak tight and scared money. KOD's lucky he doesn't have to deal with all the aggression at $400 NL

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what i meant was i would expect $50/$100nl to be WAY more aggressive than midstakes, especially hu. Which is why i can't fathom folding. So what are you saying you'd do here FWF?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold this without much thought. the aggressive regs that you constantly stack off with AQ against have way wider ranges than Mike Matusow does when he shoves in this spot without any signs of tilt or history of doing this.

[FionnMac]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WOW this is weird...i happily felt AQ vs aggressive regs at 400nl and 600nl, especially when they overpush on my 3-bets. So HEADS UP at at much bigger stakes vs a spewy aggro opponent, it should be very standard to felt here no?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, every player at 50-100 and higher is just weak tight and scared money. KOD's lucky he doesn't have to deal with all the aggression at $400 NL

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what i meant was i would expect $50/$100nl to be WAY more aggressive than midstakes, especially hu. Which is why i can't fathom folding. So what are you saying you'd do here FWF?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold this without much thought. the aggressive regs that you constantly stack off with AQ against have way wider ranges than Mike Matusow does when he shoves in this spot without any signs of tilt or history of doing this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, well fair enough, if you, cts etc say fold then i guess it's a fold! Strange though, i would have thought the hu high stakes were alot more aggro pf than that...

[imabigdeal]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WOW this is weird...i happily felt AQ vs aggressive regs at 400nl and 600nl, especially when they overpush on my 3-bets. So HEADS UP at at much bigger stakes vs a spewy aggro opponent, it should be very standard to felt here no?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, every player at 50-100 and higher is just weak tight and scared money. KOD's lucky he doesn't have to deal with all the aggression at $400 NL

[/ QUOTE ]

Well what i meant was i would expect $50/$100nl to be WAY more aggressive than midstakes, especially hu. Which is why i can't fathom folding. So what are you saying you'd do here FWF?

[/ QUOTE ]

i would fold this without much thought. the aggressive regs that you constantly stack off with AQ against have way wider ranges than Mike Matusow does when he shoves in this spot without any signs of tilt or history of doing this.

[/ QUOTE ]

FWF did you not see that hand dean posted where matusow did the exact same thing and showed 27ss? meanwhile, KOD results?

[MYNAMEIZGREG]

I played Mike HU and he made a ridiculous shove with 22 against me with no history.


If he hadn't said gamble I would call, but since he did I'm not sure what to do... I might still call..

[ace_in_the_hole]

AK ONLY

[PMP07]

[ QUOTE ]
FullTiltPoker Game #3013721067: Table Masters (heads up) - $50/$100 - No Limit Hold'em - 10:56:46 ET - 2007/07/21
Seat 1: Mike Matusow ($13,446)
Seat 2: HAAANH ($9,750)
Mike Matusow posts the small blind of $50
HAAANH posts the big blind of $100
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HAAANH [Qh Ah]
Mike Matusow raises to $300
HAAANH raises to $999
Mike Matusow raises to $13,446, and is all in
HAAANH has 15 seconds left to act
Mike Matusow: gamble

zzzz?

[/ QUOTE ]

FOLD. I wouldn't gamble this much preflop with Mike when I know he's gonna blow up down the line. As far as Mike M's range is concerned, I think its huge. I once saw him shove 44 preflop for 100 BB's against grimstarr, and also 99 against me for over 100BB's. All in all, i still like a fold

[maxtower]

I think him writing gamble eliminates a lot of junk hands from his range. I would place more emphasis on that than anything else in this hand.

[iRock]

I have a decent amount of hands logged with mike (like 10k maybe) and unless he is tilting this is a fold. For every 1 time he shows up with 27 or 94, he shows up with AK or a pair 10 times.