Dan Harrington on Cash Poker...We buy his books? Watch this video.

[The Hag]

After seeing the first few seconds of the clip, I was thinking this was going to be the KQ KT hand, and as soon as I saw Dan with KT hearts, I thought, damn son, OP is about to get flamed hard. Good to see I wasn't wrong.
OP you really suck. Comparing this to the Tilly hand is a [censored] joke and you should probably spend a bit more time in the strat forums.

[sh58]

why is this like the tilly hand

williams play was terrible throughout. he should have folded preflop as KQo doesn't have great implied odds. if it was sooted, go for it. should have folded on the flop. harrington is usually gonna have him crushed. fold on the turn.

don't go broke in an unraised pot. i don't like harringtons turn shove tho

[Poker monkey]

Someone went broke in an unraised pot and it wasn't Williams.

[Assani Fisher]

[ QUOTE ]
I think both of them played this hand fine. Not saying I would have necessarily made the same call David did, but I think he made it for good reason.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed completely with the only exception being that if Dan did some deeper level thinking he may realize that his turn bet would be interpreted by DW just as it was(DW verbally goes through the thought process of "why on earth would he bet into me if he can be pretty sure that if he checks I'd bet?").

I'm shocked at so many people critisizing DW, especially critisizing his turn call which was very well thought out imo.

[SaulPaul]

thats sum crazy nipple rubbing at the end of the hand there...

[bones]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think both of them played this hand fine. Not saying I would have necessarily made the same call David did, but I think he made it for good reason.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed completely with the only exception being that if Dan did some deeper level thinking he may realize that his turn bet would be interpreted by DW just as it was(DW verbally goes through the thought process of "why on earth would he bet into me if he can be pretty sure that if he checks I'd bet?").

I'm shocked at so many people critisizing DW, especially critisizing his turn call which was very well thought out imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Definitely. Put someone on the only hand you can beat and call.

[darom03]

[ QUOTE ]
agreed completely with the only exception being that if Dan did some deeper level thinking he may realize that his turn bet would be interpreted by DW just as it was(DW verbally goes through the thought process of "why on earth would he bet into me if he can be pretty sure that if he checks I'd bet?").

[/ QUOTE ]

But if DH actually put DW on top pair AQ would he not expect DW to check the flop behind him, scared of the jack after being re-raised on the flop? And by leading out DH semibluffs, representing scared trips.

[RajHendon]

If I had Dan's cards and that flop arrived, it was an all-in on the flop decision for me (Kh10h), with the flush draw and open ended straight draw combo. On the flop, Williams was faced with Qc4hJh with hole cards: KcQd. An all-in on the flop from Dan would have very possibly shut down Williams, thereby preventing the Williams top two pair on the river.

[RajHendon]

The turn bet was a semi-bluff and not poor play, imo.

[NickyC]

[ QUOTE ]
thats sum crazy nipple rubbing at the end of the hand there...

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, this was incredibly disturbing. I'm trying to understand why people are ragging on Williams so hard, he made a great call on the turn to a very suspect bet by DH. The immediacy of the turn push by DH reminded me of Moneymaker against Sammy. Considering the time DH usually takes to make a decision, DW definitely picked something up with the speed of the turn push.
I'm too much of a pussy to make that sort of call like DW, and I know that so that's why I play limit. Give DW credit, awesome call.