![]() |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why can't they just play 5/10 and notch off a digit?
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Awesome, $130 from the original $200 left on the table.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good thing these guys don't post on 2+2 (or do they?) or else the winner would probably post in NVG asking about what they should do because they forgot about the rake raping them in small stakes and he thinks he should have won more.
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
the rake is gonna eat into it so much eventually that it will become more like a crapshoot. the rake eating their stacks is somewhat like blinds going up [/ QUOTE ] They should have done this on play money. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the rake is gonna eat into it so much eventually that it will become more like a crapshoot. the rake eating their stacks is somewhat like blinds going up [/ QUOTE ] They should have done this on play money. [/ QUOTE ] There aren't any heads up play money tables. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sit at an empty table, get friends/2'ers to occupy and sit-out.. HUHU.
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Good thing these guys don't post on 2+2 (or do they?) or else the winner would probably post in NVG asking about what they should do because they forgot about the rake raping them in small stakes and he thinks he should have won more. [/ QUOTE ] It's a freezeout- the guy with zero pays the full $100k. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
WTF why don't they just play play money? Isn't it like, I dunno, [censored] annoying to deal with that rake?
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Why can't they just play 5/10 and notch off a digit? [/ QUOTE ] makes a lot more sense, the rake is absurd relative to effective stacks, they have raked off 70k of the total lol |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
WTF why don't they just play play money? Isn't it like, I dunno, [censored] annoying to deal with that rake? [/ QUOTE ] Can you PT play? |
![]() |
|
|