#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
I got that error too, but just went through the "Web Help" button on the error dialog box and it pretty much guided me right to it. Usually I give up right away, but I took the small extra step and it paid off big time. Here is the direct link to the codec for those too lazy: http://www.wmplugins.com/ItemDetail....amp;codec=tscc [/ QUOTE ] I just DLed a pack of codecs and the new WMP 10 and still no good. Let's see if your link helps the situation. Hooray! Thanks, now I have something to do this afternoon! |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video.
Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88.
Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88. Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1. [/ QUOTE ] I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
Just went by the AK hand where only the BB called you and then donked into you on a AT9 board. I'm waiting for the turn to c/r for these reasons: 1. We're likely ahead and I get more from the hand if I let him waste another bet on the turn with a weak ace or air. I don't want him leaving the flop if he has air. I'd like him to bluff again. 2. He made a donkey move, so I'll consider him a donkey until he proves otherwise. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah.. if I recall correctly, I even talked about my decision on that hand stating that sometimes I wait, sometimes I fast play. I'll have to check the vid though. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88. Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1. [/ QUOTE ] I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way. [/ QUOTE ] That was another hand I think I commented about... wouldn't I ended up w/ trip Jacks or something? Don't be so damn results oriented [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Re: my notes... as I mentioned in the vid, my notes tend to be a bit more spelled out and not so cryptic. My notes vary from week to week as well..LOL |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video. Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] His defending w/ 94o was still better than that other guy's play w/ KK [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88. Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1. [/ QUOTE ] I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way. [/ QUOTE ] That was another hand I think I commented about... wouldn't I ended up w/ trip Jacks or something? Don't be so damn results oriented [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]... [/ QUOTE ] Haha, I gotcha, I didn't even watch the action after PF since I'm at work I was mostly listening, but was looking for that hand because I saw the other guy had commented on it before my viewing had reached it. Also, I posted in support of your fold...mostly, even though I hemmed and hawed around other choices as I tend to do. Damn my indecisiveness. Good video though. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video. Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] His defending w/ 94o was still better than that other guy's play w/ KK [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I'm always surprised at first when I lose those types of hands, and then I'm just thankful for it being cheap like you said in the vid. I wanted to say something like, "Are you playing this hand live or something." because I'd expect an old nit to play KK that way. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?
Holy crap you are a huge nit [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]<font color="white">Okay I didn't watch it yet =p </font>
|
|
|