Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:06 PM
Brain Brain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,364
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
I got that error too, but just went through the "Web Help" button on the error dialog box and it pretty much guided me right to it.

Usually I give up right away, but I took the small extra step and it paid off big time. Here is the direct link to the codec for those too lazy:

http://www.wmplugins.com/ItemDetail....amp;codec=tscc

[/ QUOTE ]

I just DLed a pack of codecs and the new WMP 10 and still no good. Let's see if your link helps the situation.

Hooray! Thanks, now I have something to do this afternoon!
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:10 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video.

Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:15 PM
shuinthehouse shuinthehouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 193
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88.

Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-21-2007, 02:47 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88.

Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:34 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
Just went by the AK hand where only the BB called you and then donked into you on a AT9 board. I'm waiting for the turn to c/r for these reasons:

1. We're likely ahead and I get more from the hand if I let him waste another bet on the turn with a weak ace or air. I don't want him leaving the flop if he has air. I'd like him to bluff again.

2. He made a donkey move, so I'll consider him a donkey until he proves otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah.. if I recall correctly, I even talked about my decision on that hand stating that sometimes I wait, sometimes I fast play. I'll have to check the vid though.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:36 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88.

Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

That was another hand I think I commented about... wouldn't I ended up w/ trip Jacks or something? Don't be so damn results oriented [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Re: my notes... as I mentioned in the vid, my notes tend to be a bit more spelled out and not so cryptic. My notes vary from week to week as well..LOL
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:38 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video.

Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

His defending w/ 94o was still better than that other guy's play w/ KK [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:45 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Bravos - why the fold with JTo in MP2 with 2 (3?) limps before you? I think my default is to raise KQo+ (and 99+) there and limp JTo, JTs, T9s and 22-88.

Note taking tip: instead of CC'd for cold-called-raise I use CCR (or CC2R if appropriate), and instead of e.g. UTG+1 use UTG1.

[/ QUOTE ]

I just saw this hand and with three yet to act w/ position on me, I probably lean towarding folding it to. Easy call if suited, but limping along doesn't suck either. I want to be a little later w/ that hand there, but again, I could go either way.

[/ QUOTE ]

That was another hand I think I commented about... wouldn't I ended up w/ trip Jacks or something? Don't be so damn results oriented [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]...

[/ QUOTE ]

Haha, I gotcha, I didn't even watch the action after PF since I'm at work I was mostly listening, but was looking for that hand because I saw the other guy had commented on it before my viewing had reached it.

Also, I posted in support of your fold...mostly, even though I hemmed and hawed around other choices as I tend to do. Damn my indecisiveness. Good video though.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 06-21-2007, 04:47 PM
Befolder Befolder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Heading back to black
Posts: 2,311
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Worked instantly for me Brain after restarting the video.

Hey Bravos, no banging on that guy defending w/ 49o in the BB. That's my lucky hand...back in my earlier days. Not a lot of opportunities to play it for obvious reasons.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

His defending w/ 94o was still better than that other guy's play w/ KK [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I'm always surprised at first when I lose those types of hands, and then I'm just thankful for it being cheap like you said in the vid.

I wanted to say something like, "Are you playing this hand live or something." because I'd expect an old nit to play KK that way.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 06-21-2007, 07:05 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 10,661
Default Re: raising the stakes on session reviews?

Holy crap you are a huge nit [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]<font color="white">Okay I didn't watch it yet =p </font>
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.