#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Perhpas a retarded laydown 5/10
tbh i think checking this turn is bettter than leading it. River however is a lead for me.
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Perhpas a retarded laydown 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
spades and JT won't call again.... The bet doesn't have a huge amount of value... [/ QUOTE ] I'm not saying they will. I'm saying if his range is good, made hand + draw, he's only betting the made hand and checking behind with draws. Shouldn't we bet, get another call or raise from a made hand as opposed to giving a free card to the draw or check-raising 2 pair off of their hand? [ QUOTE ] he will often bet the hands he would call + you get value from some that wouldn't call. [/ QUOTE ] He'll often bet the hands he'll call, but he won't call with draws? So how can that be better than just leading again? If we lead, he calls with good hand and folds draw. If we check, he bets good hand and checks draw. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Perhpas a retarded laydown 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
tbh i think checking this turn is bettter than leading it. River however is a lead for me. [/ QUOTE ] you like giving a freecard to the most obvious on this board and then leading into it when it gets there? okay cool |
|
|