|
View Poll Results: traz | |||
Exactly what I expected | 0 | 0% | |
Pretty much what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Kinda what I expected | 2 | 8.70% | |
Not really what I expected | 11 | 47.83% | |
Definitely not what I expected | 8 | 34.78% | |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
my heads hurts [/ QUOTE ] you tried to read that hand history too? |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
This thread has exciting implications
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
Man Absolute is really bad at rigging their site. Maybe they could use the info in a less obvious spot?
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
This thread has exciting implications [/ QUOTE ] This would be really [censored] for online poker. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
hey look what I found at pocket5s: OK, SOMEONE!! Explain this call please. by Stuman123 on 9/13/2007 00:45 HOW does he make this call?!?!?!?! Heads up in the 1K on AP....This makes no sense. Stage #896976330 Tourney ID 1883389 Holdem Multi Normal Tournament No Limit $4500 - 2007-09-13 01:43:49 (ET) Table: 14 (Real Money) Seat #3 is the dealer Seat 3 - POTRIPPER ($765740 in chips) Seat 8 - CRAZYMARCO ($214260 in chips) POTRIPPER - Ante $450 CRAZYMARCO - Ante $450 POTRIPPER - Posts small blind $2250 CRAZYMARCO - Posts big blind $4500 *** POCKET CARDS *** POTRIPPER - Calls $2250 CRAZYMARCO - Checks *** FLOP *** [4h Kd Kh] CRAZYMARCO - Checks POTRIPPER - Bets $9000 CRAZYMARCO - Calls $9000 *** TURN *** [4h Kd Kh] [7s] CRAZYMARCO - Checks POTRIPPER - Bets $13500 CRAZYMARCO - All-In(Raise) $200310 to $200310 POTRIPPER - Calls $186810 *** RIVER *** [4h Kd Kh 7s] [5s] *** SHOW DOWN *** POTRIPPER - Shows [10c 9c] (One pair, kings) CRAZYMARCO - Shows [9h 2h] (One pair, kings) POTRIPPER Collects $428520 from main pot *** SUMMARY *** Total Pot($428520) Board [4h Kd Kh 7s 5s] Seat 3: POTRIPPER (dealer) (small blind) won Total ($428520) HI$428520) with One pair, kings(ten kicker) [10c 9c - B:Kh,B:Kd,P:10c,P:9c,B:7s] Seat 8: CRAZYMARCO (big blind) HI:lost with One pair, kings [9h 2h - B:Kh,B:Kd,P:9h,B:7s,B:5s] this name is not mentioned but I'm going to go ahead and guess it's related somehow [/ QUOTE ] So not only do they cheat, but they are really bad at it too. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This thread has exciting implications [/ QUOTE ] This would be really [censored] for online poker. [/ QUOTE ] Could possibly be a good thing. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
this is unreal bad.
;dfkjaskfljas |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] This thread has exciting implications [/ QUOTE ] This would be really [censored] for online poker. [/ QUOTE ] Could possibly be a good thing. [/ QUOTE ] Explica por favor. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
[ QUOTE ]
wtf is going on? [/ QUOTE ] |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
So is there actually any evidence of this? You guys seem to be taking it awful serious.
|
|
|