30inch or 2 20 inch ? - Page 5

Chesskid1 · #41 09-30-2007, 10:13 PM

dell 30" on right, Samsung 204BW on left.

allstaryou · #42 09-30-2007, 10:17 PM

are those all default size on each monitor?

_dave_ · #43 09-30-2007, 11:02 PM

[ QUOTE ]

I was checking this out this morning and after some testing
it doesn't look like you can fit 12 tables on without any overlap.

[/ QUOTE ]

12 is possible on a 24" 1920x1200, with no overlap.

You must reduce windows borders to a single pixel - then they fit perfectly when at minimum size.

30" is far preferable tho - gogogo FPP store, can't wait [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

themandude · #44 10-01-2007, 01:05 AM

Alobar · #45 10-01-2007, 02:11 AM

[ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

hahaha, good eye

Nsight7 · #46 10-01-2007, 07:36 AM

30" monitors are dandy and all, but they are massively expensive. One could hook up 3 22" monitors, if one was thrifty about it, for perhaps half as much as a single 30". I suppose it is balla to get the 30", but as a practical matter, better to get 2 (or even 3) 22" monitors for a much cheaper price.