|
|
#473
09-01-2007, 07:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
ASU > ND No really, they'd likely be top 50 maybe top 40 this year. [/ QUOTE ] No really, the first part of the post in no way contradicts the second part. 
|
|
#474
09-01-2007, 07:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
ASU > ND No really, they'd likely be top 50 maybe top 40 this year. [/ QUOTE ] lol
|
|
#475
09-01-2007, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] same old Illinois...finding ways to lose games that they shouldn't lose [/ QUOTE ] Eh cmon man, I know you're dissapointed, but you guys were supposed to lose this game, and made a sick comeback. It shows a lot that your young guys came back like that. EDIT: I also didn't watch the whole game, so maybe I shouldn't be commenting on it. Just wanted to say that I was impressed from what I saw. [/ QUOTE ] losing close doesn't mean crap this team has already done that the turnovers were self-inflicted and the 6 point difference and then some Illinois has enough to beat Mizzou....idiot mistakes and Zook coaching are the only reason they weren't favored seems like little changed over the off-season
|
|
#477
09-01-2007, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
At least the other 2 ESPN games are gonna be blowouts. So all my attention can be put towards UT vs Cal. [/ QUOTE ] really?
|
|
#478
09-01-2007, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ASU > ND No really, they'd likely be top 50 maybe top 40 this year. [/ QUOTE ] lol [/ QUOTE ] Umm... the D2 champ is almost always in the top 65-50 teams. Do you wanna make a wager on this?
|
|
#479
09-01-2007, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] same old Illinois...finding ways to lose games that they shouldn't lose [/ QUOTE ] Eh cmon man, I know you're dissapointed, but you guys were supposed to lose this game, and made a sick comeback. It shows a lot that your young guys came back like that. EDIT: I also didn't watch the whole game, so maybe I shouldn't be commenting on it. Just wanted to say that I was impressed from what I saw. [/ QUOTE ] losing close doesn't mean crap this team has already done that the turnovers were self-inflicted and the 6 point difference and then some Illinois has enough to beat Mizzou....idiot mistakes and Zook coaching are the only reason they weren't favored seems like little changed over the off-season [/ QUOTE ] You're too upset. Turnover are bad and -3 > 6pts. Our staring QB was out, a true freshman took over, and the team is still hella young. They'll win the 5, maybe 6 games we expect this year and next year they should go bowling. 2009 for the BCS baby.
|
|
#480
09-01-2007, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: College Football Week One Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] ASU > ND No really, they'd likely be top 50 maybe top 40 this year. [/ QUOTE ] lol [/ QUOTE ] Umm... the D2 champ is almost always in the top 65-50 teams. Do you wanna make a wager on this? [/ QUOTE ] I love D2 football, it's my favorite of all the levels. But you think that Bloomsburg is a top 100 team? Carson-Newman is top 120? Grand Valley is top 60???? Theres no way, they don't have the scholarships to compete with the 1A or 1AA schools. Christ Bloomsburg only uses 1/2 of the allotted amount of scholarships because that is all they can afford. Unless of course I am being leveled...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
