|
|
#4632
09-12-2007, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Min buying is totally fine and more profitable for us in long-run. It is the ratholing that must go. Ongame never allowed ratholing, so not like the technology is to hard or something. I beleive it was like an hour, before you could min buy again. [/ QUOTE ] Expected hourly rates obv drop the more short stacks around [/ QUOTE ] This is not obvious at all. In reality I expect it to be a positive for midstakes, but not highstakes. There are a ton of terrible unkowns who just buy in for min (or just over) in the big games and now will have to move down to donk away their money. [/ QUOTE ] im with you. there are a ton of bad shortstacks. i dunno, i played sngs for a long time and still play a ton of mtts so maybe im more comfortable playing against them, but jesus some of them give away money, and im certain no shortstacker makes money off me. i get that they change the dynamic of the game, but sometimes i dont think its enough for me to want them to leave. especially at 25/50... jesus theyre bad. |
|
#4633
09-12-2007, 03:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Min buying is totally fine and more profitable for us in long-run. It is the ratholing that must go. Ongame never allowed ratholing, so not like the technology is to hard or something. I beleive it was like an hour, before you could min buy again. [/ QUOTE ] Expected hourly rates obv drop the more short stacks around [/ QUOTE ] This is not obvious at all. In reality I expect it to be a positive for midstakes, but not highstakes. There are a ton of terrible unkowns who just buy in for min (or just over) in the big games and now will have to move down to donk away their money. [/ QUOTE ] im with you. there are a ton of bad shortstacks. i dunno, i played sngs for a long time and still play a ton of mtts so maybe im more comfortable playing against them, but jesus some of them give away money, and im certain no shortstacker makes money off me. i get that they change the dynamic of the game, but sometimes i dont think its enough for me to want them to leave. especially at 25/50... jesus theyre bad. [/ QUOTE ] I'm with ya T. they don't make a dime off me. But they kill the preflop action when you want to play speculative hands against fish. And by fish I mean mostly 2+2ers |
|
#4634
09-12-2007, 03:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Min buying is totally fine and more profitable for us in long-run. It is the ratholing that must go. Ongame never allowed ratholing, so not like the technology is to hard or something. I beleive it was like an hour, before you could min buy again. [/ QUOTE ] Expected hourly rates obv drop the more short stacks around [/ QUOTE ] This is not obvious at all. In reality I expect it to be a positive for midstakes, but not highstakes. There are a ton of terrible unkowns who just buy in for min (or just over) in the big games and now will have to move down to donk away their money. [/ QUOTE ] im with you. there are a ton of bad shortstacks. i dunno, i played sngs for a long time and still play a ton of mtts so maybe im more comfortable playing against them, but jesus some of them give away money, and im certain no shortstacker makes money off me. i get that they change the dynamic of the game, but sometimes i dont think its enough for me to want them to leave. especially at 25/50... jesus theyre bad. [/ QUOTE ] I'm with ya T. they don't make a dime off me. But they kill the preflop action when you want to play speculative hands against fish. And by fish I mean mostly 2+2ers [/ QUOTE ] Such as yourself |
|
#4636
09-12-2007, 04:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
You can do it through buddylist or atleast you could a couple of years ago.. [/ QUOTE ] Ok thank you. I haven't seen it before so it kinda freaked me out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#4637
09-12-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
Such as yourself [/ QUOTE ] I could care less what ya'll think of my game. But if you are all so confident that I am so bad.. someone step-up and cross-book my action for a month or two. I'll play nice and spewy for ya. |
|
#4638
09-12-2007, 04:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Min buying is totally fine and more profitable for us in long-run. It is the ratholing that must go. Ongame never allowed ratholing, so not like the technology is to hard or something. I beleive it was like an hour, before you could min buy again. [/ QUOTE ] Expected hourly rates obv drop the more short stacks around [/ QUOTE ] This is not obvious at all. In reality I expect it to be a positive for midstakes, but not highstakes. There are a ton of terrible unkowns who just buy in for min (or just over) in the big games and now will have to move down to donk away their money. [/ QUOTE ] im with you. there are a ton of bad shortstacks. i dunno, i played sngs for a long time and still play a ton of mtts so maybe im more comfortable playing against them, but jesus some of them give away money, and im certain no shortstacker makes money off me. i get that they change the dynamic of the game, but sometimes i dont think its enough for me to want them to leave. especially at 25/50... jesus theyre bad. [/ QUOTE ] I'm with ya T. they don't make a dime off me. But they kill the preflop action when you want to play speculative hands against fish. And by fish I mean mostly 2+2ers [/ QUOTE ] Um, you play above 5/10 once in a blue moon. Therefore, as I said it will be a win-win for you guys as the unkown short-stacking fish at 2k and 5k will have to move down to mid-stakes. |
|
#4639
09-12-2007, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Party Regulars Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Min buying is totally fine and more profitable for us in long-run. It is the ratholing that must go. Ongame never allowed ratholing, so not like the technology is to hard or something. I beleive it was like an hour, before you could min buy again. [/ QUOTE ] Expected hourly rates obv drop the more short stacks around [/ QUOTE ] This is not obvious at all. In reality I expect it to be a positive for midstakes, but not highstakes. There are a ton of terrible unkowns who just buy in for min (or just over) in the big games and now will have to move down to donk away their money. [/ QUOTE ] im with you. there are a ton of bad shortstacks. i dunno, i played sngs for a long time and still play a ton of mtts so maybe im more comfortable playing against them, but jesus some of them give away money, and im certain no shortstacker makes money off me. i get that they change the dynamic of the game, but sometimes i dont think its enough for me to want them to leave. especially at 25/50... jesus theyre bad. [/ QUOTE ] I'm with ya T. they don't make a dime off me. But they kill the preflop action when you want to play speculative hands against fish. And by fish I mean mostly 2+2ers [/ QUOTE ] Um, you play above 5/10 once in a blue moon. Therefore, as I said it will be a win-win for you guys as the unkown short-stacking fish at 2k and 5k will have to move down to mid-stakes. [/ QUOTE ] That is if they raise the min buyin and not just change their ratholing policy (which I think they are doing) |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
