|
View Poll Results: Which is better? | |||
(1) GoldenEye | 88 | 84.62% | |
(16) The World is Not Enough | 16 | 15.38% | |
Voters: 104. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#451
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
so is that saying he's 4100 over ev?
|
#452
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
Oh snap on that EV graph. Can't wait to see if that holds true for the entire 1.6m hands.
EDIT: Though it doesn't really matter anyway. |
#453
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
lol why am i absolutely not surprised @ the graph [/ QUOTE ] Because you understand probabilty ? |
#454
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
1.6 mill? I thought its was 4. What happen the rest?
|
#455
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
1.6 mill? I thought its was 4. What happen the rest? [/ QUOTE ] Delusion - its one thing. |
#456
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
Oh snap on that EV graph. Can't wait to see if that holds true for the entire 1.6m hands. EDIT: Though it doesn't really matter anyway. [/ QUOTE ] well, one graph would matter. The lucktab. Its just gonna give us AI winnings in terms of actual winnings and sklansky bucks. Regardless of what any other graph says, according to FGators, he is a sklanksy bucks millionaire. |
#457
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1.6 mill? I thought its was 4. What happen the rest? [/ QUOTE ] Delusion - its one thing. [/ QUOTE ] Im starting to think its the only thing. |
#458
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] This amazing....do what you can to get the rest of the graph up plz. wowowowowowowow |
#459
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
[ QUOTE ]
so is that saying he's 4100 over ev? [/ QUOTE ] extrapolated to 1.6M hands that's about $47K over EV. OMG FGATORS RUN GODLY |
#460
|
|||
|
|||
Re: call me the graph maker
So, can someone more statistically minded tell me how high above expectation he's running in this graph, as like a measure of standard deviations or what the odds are that someone would run that hot over that sample size or something along those lines
|
|
|