Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #431  
Old 10-26-2007, 10:57 AM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

There was no need to play the "1-7 is 1-7, but" card.

You had me at, "Here is an excellent post from NDNation."
Reply With Quote
  #432  
Old 10-26-2007, 11:23 AM
Austiger Austiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

I'd like to see the numbers of Auburn and Florida compared to these...

[ QUOTE ]
The numbers are the amount of starts that players in each class have accumulated thus far in the season:

NOTRE DAME - eight games played
Fr - 15
So - 48
Jr - 45
Sr - 21
5th- 47


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #433  
Old 10-26-2007, 11:45 AM
Bigdaddydvo Bigdaddydvo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Funtown, USA
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football. *DELETED*

Post deleted by MEbenhoe
Reply With Quote
  #434  
Old 10-26-2007, 12:11 PM
shemp shemp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: www.twoplustwo.com
Posts: 2,733
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
Out of 2000+ predictions, only 10 brave, depressing souls predicted our probable final record of 5-7.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?
Reply With Quote
  #435  
Old 10-26-2007, 01:37 PM
Austiger Austiger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,504
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

Okay, I found Auburn's participation stats. I'd love to see Florida's too, but here are ours compared to ND's. I combined the Sr and 5th yr senior totals for ND since I don't have Auburn's separated.

NOTRE DAME - eight games played
Fr - 15
So - 48
Jr - 45
Sr - 68

Auburn (8 games):
Fr - 38
So - 37
Jr - 43
Sr - 58

NOTRE DAME OFFENSIVE LINE
Fr - 0
So - 16
Jr - 16
Sr - 8

Auburn:
Fr - 20
So - 0
Jr - 16
Sr - 4

QB:
NOTRE DAME
Fr - 6
So - 1
Jr - 1
Sr - 0
5th- 0

Auburn:
Fr- 1
Sr- 7

Also the overall numbers don't include special teams. Auburn's kicker and punter are both freshmen. Most of our KO returns have been by a freshman. Our punt returner is a junior, but was replaced by a freshman @ LSU. I have no idea what ND's special teams experience is, but you can't get younger than that.

So all in all, Auburn is actually less experienced by a decent margin. ND's schedule is 2nd toughest according to Sagarin. Auburn's is #3. So that excuse doesn't hold either.
Reply With Quote
  #436  
Old 10-26-2007, 02:30 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of 2000+ predictions, only 10 brave, depressing souls predicted our probable final record of 5-7.

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

[/ QUOTE ]

As much as Bigdaddy is in denial, the sad thing is he is one of the most reasonable Domers out there, as evidenced by this article. "Rivals says he recruits well, so he is awesome!"

So many excuses, its amazing. Just a huge amount of denial, it could only be from Catholics. Oh well, you guys are going to have to learn the hard way after he brings you down so low, the only national title you can compete for is Division III.
Reply With Quote
  #437  
Old 10-26-2007, 02:51 PM
Dudd Dudd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,048
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]
Okay, I found Auburn's participation stats. I'd love to see Florida's too, but here are ours compared to ND's. I combined the Sr and 5th yr senior totals for ND since I don't have Auburn's separated.

NOTRE DAME - eight games played
Fr - 15
So - 48
Jr - 45
Sr - 68

Auburn (8 games):
Fr - 38
So - 37
Jr - 43
Sr - 58

NOTRE DAME OFFENSIVE LINE
Fr - 0
So - 16
Jr - 16
Sr - 8

Auburn:
Fr - 20
So - 0
Jr - 16
Sr - 4

QB:
NOTRE DAME
Fr - 6
So - 1
Jr - 1
Sr - 0
5th- 0

Auburn:
Fr- 1
Sr- 7

Also the overall numbers don't include special teams. Auburn's kicker and punter are both freshmen. Most of our KO returns have been by a freshman. Our punt returner is a junior, but was replaced by a freshman @ LSU. I have no idea what ND's special teams experience is, but you can't get younger than that.

So all in all, Auburn is actually less experienced by a decent margin. ND's schedule is 2nd toughest according to Sagarin. Auburn's is #3. So that excuse doesn't hold either.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I really think they're reaching at straws looking at the inexperience angle. It's not that we're young, Auburn is just one of many teams who have proven that you can win with young talent, but it's that we're completely non-competitive this year, which there is no way in hell a well coached team should be. I'm not saying I want him fired yet, but if there isn't significant improvement next year, I probably will.
Reply With Quote
  #438  
Old 10-26-2007, 02:57 PM
TomCollins TomCollins is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Approving of Iron\'s Moderation
Posts: 7,517
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

[ QUOTE ]


Yeah, I really think they're reaching at straws looking at the inexperience angle. It's not that we're young, Auburn is just one of many teams who have proven that you can win with young talent, but it's that we're completely non-competitive this year, which there is no way in hell a well coached team should be. I'm not saying I want him fired yet, but if there isn't significant improvement next year, I probably will.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't really be a Domer, wow, a reasonable response. Even if he wins the rivals.com National Championship, you'd look for results on the field?
Reply With Quote
  #439  
Old 10-26-2007, 03:13 PM
damaniac damaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Looking for law jobs
Posts: 2,917
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

One response to the BGS response. They said:

"I would like to see the naysayers point to another coach who, without any relevant previous head coaching or college coaching experience, lead an incredibly high-profile team to levels of comparable achievement."

How many high-profile teams HIRE coaches without any relevant head coaching or college level coaching experience? Of course no one can find anyone in such a situation that has done as well as Weis; major programs don't hire these people as head coaches.

Overall, the defense suffers the same defect as most of what we've been hearing: it tries to justify this unholy abortion of a season on almost anything other than Weis, with the ocassional "yeah but he's learning, everyone learns on the job" rif. Sure, everyone learns on the job, and everyone makes mistakes, but no one who winds up being good every does this bad. That's the point.

Basically, the ND line is that Weis just so happens to be at the center of the greatest "perfect storm" ever, and in other words is just very, very unlucky. That's possible, but Occam's Razor suggests otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #440  
Old 10-26-2007, 03:28 PM
owsley owsley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: thank you
Posts: 774
Default Re: The state of Notre Dame football.

I don't follow college FB too closely, but as an unbiased observer, the ND blog response just looks completely delusional. The slate article might be kind of beating a dead horse but the statistics are pretty staggering, 119th in total offense and averaging 1 yard a rush? But then again he did coach Vinny Testaverde to a division championship. Sometimes as a fan as a sports team you just have to admit that your team sucks and things probably won't get better. I mean the guy is signed on for 10 years. Once you are actually honest about things it is pretty liberating, believe me.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.