|
|
#421
12-13-2006, 02:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A sub-point
the paper linked describes a certain type of efficiency. i'm still working on it myself.
|
|
#423
12-13-2006, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
it opened fine in firefox. click on "download now" then it should forward you. if not, pm me your email and i'll send it that way.
|
|
#424
12-13-2006, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
[ QUOTE ]
it sure isn't total profit. where can i upload the pdf? [/ QUOTE ] Probably to a website owned by a capitalist pig.
|
|
#425
12-13-2006, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
Ok I'll have a look at it. One thing I'd like to interject here. The fact that the employees of a company do not own the majority of the stock does not invalidate your point IMO. Employees can and are motivated to be more "effecient" IMO by stock ownership in the companies they work for even if the sum total of stock ownership is a fraction of the outstanding shares.
|
|
#426
12-13-2006, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it sure isn't total profit. where can i upload the pdf? [/ QUOTE ] Probably to a website owned by a capitalist pig. [/ QUOTE ] and regulated by the state oh noes
|
|
#427
12-13-2006, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
[ QUOTE ]
Ok I'll have a look at it. One thing I'd like to interject here. The fact that the employees of a company do not own the majority of the stock does not invalidate your point IMO. Employees can and are motivated to be more "effecient" IMO by stock ownership in the companies they work for even if the sum total of stock ownership is a fraction of the outstanding shares. [/ QUOTE ] the conclusion actually is there is no evidence of a statistically significant difference of total labor efficiency between labor-managed and capital-managed firms, looking at output to labor, output to capital, and capital to labor ratios. More study needs to be done, but I can confirm the stats work involved is legit.
|
|
#428
12-13-2006, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it sure isn't total profit. where can i upload the pdf? [/ QUOTE ] Probably to a website owned by a capitalist pig. [/ QUOTE ] and regulated by the state oh noes [/ QUOTE ] Yes, did you get your approval from the Internet Decency Minister? Anyway, can you make a post that simply defines your newspeak definition of "efficiency".
|
|
#429
12-13-2006, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
why don't you read the pdf instead of continuing your ignorance? It gives a better definition of technical efficiency that I can.
|
|
#430
12-13-2006, 02:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A sub-point
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm asking if AC does anything for him? [/ QUOTE ] AC doesn't do anything for anyone. If you think someone needs help, then go right ahead and help. [/ QUOTE ] All I needed to hear.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
