|
View Poll Results: In a 3way pot, on a really rag flop such as 7high, do you cbet 1st to act? | |||
Yes | 11 | 68.75% | |
No | 5 | 31.25% | |
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#411
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
Let's not forget that the most significant thing she did this past month was cash in the Ladies event at the WSOP...
|
#412
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] come on man, whorish? f that. dont make me give some lame ass double standards speech here, but calling her names is just a lame way to go here. [/ QUOTE ] ??? From what little we've learned she seems to sleep with guys before even getting to know them. She is currently sleeping with a guy who has no interest in her other than as a good lay. What would you call that? "lame double standards speech"? I have no idea how this relates to what I said. "name calling"? These are adjectives, not names. She seems whorish in her promiscuity, juvenille in her reaction to cardo's interest, and vindictive in her responses in this thread. [/ QUOTE ] going from, "from what little we;ve learned" to "here are some value judgements" when the "little we;ve learned" is about like 5% of the situation is a huge mistake.(i was in communication with all parties while this is happening and my impression of everything that is going on is much different). my lame double standard speech was going to be about calling women whores and men nice things when they hook up. i thought this would be too cliche to make, apparently it wouldnt have been. if saying that a girl is "whorish" isnt calling names than i dont know what is. rj ps. "She is currently sleeping with a guy who has no interest in her other than as a good lay. What would you call that?" i would call that you having no [censored] idea what youre talking about. sorry dude. |
#413
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
[ QUOTE ]
let's assume, for the sake of argument, your statement above is true. if the typical OOT dork posted that he banged some broad that he had just met, he'd be showered with compliments by the overwhelming majority of this forum. a gal does it and she's a whore. how is that double standard not obvious? [/ QUOTE ] Just because a double standard may exist in some OOTiots minds, doesn't mean it exists in my post. |
#414
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] let's assume, for the sake of argument, your statement above is true. if the typical OOT dork posted that he banged some broad that he had just met, he'd be showered with compliments by the overwhelming majority of this forum. a gal does it and she's a whore. how is that double standard not obvious? [/ QUOTE ] Just because a double standard may exist in some OOTiots minds, doesn't mean it exists in my post. [/ QUOTE ] okay, i hope to see you calling many males "whores" in the coming months. gl. rj |
#415
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
I hope you start with me. I'm hoping for funner adventures.
|
#416
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
i love how this thread has gone from offensive against the other side, to defensive of yourself, to now defending the other side.
Clearly party is rigged. |
#417
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
[ QUOTE ]
okay, i hope to see you calling many males "whores" in the coming months. gl. rj [/ QUOTE ] "whorish" and "whore" are not as closely linked as they sound, are they? "Whorish" and "sllut" are more synonimus, yes? Not that I called KK either. She sleeps with guys she barely knows (cardo), or knows don't really care about her (oreo). That is whorish or slutty, no? adam22 thread. To me, promiscuity is equally contemptable no matter who displays it. It seems like it is you who might have the double standard in that it immediately jumps to your mind that promiscuity is exceptable for men, but not women. There was nothing in my first post that remotely implied a double standard, and yet, that is where your mind jumped. Or perhaps you and I simply have diametrically opposed views on promiscuity. That is, perhaps you think it is just fine to sleep with strangers whereas I believe that sex should be saved for marriage (though I'm not about to condemn sex in committed relationships). Regardless, your allegations of hypocrasy were poorly flung. Next time, gather more evidence (quote things I've said in the past) before sticking your foot in your mouth. |
#418
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
[ QUOTE ]
To me, promiscuity is equally contemptable no matter who displays it [/ QUOTE ] I can't get my head around that. You think it's contemptable? |
#419
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
CSC,
Can you please keep your tarding to the strat forums? |
#420
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Ask Anacardo about his personal life!
You're moralizing? You're driving people to gluttony with your delicious cuisine every day. LIVE WITH THAT!
|
|
|