|
|
#391
10-17-2007, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ya
[ QUOTE ]
chicago, cwar told me about this like 3 weeks ago...or is this a different scam? [/ QUOTE ] Leader posted the start of this whole scandal when it broke originally, this is the update. It's a good summary, basically somebody in the upper echelon of AP was using an account or feeding info containing the hole cards of other players during at least one tourney and some of the highest stakes games. |
|
#392
10-17-2007, 07:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ya
The whole Absolute thing doesn't surprise me. There have been so many posts on them screwing with and stealing people's money that this is to be expected almost. Many posters here refuse to use Absolute for this reason. I opened an account and never deposited because they didn't have enough games for my taste. Although this would never effect me since I don't play high enough, I am still glad that I never used them.
|
|
#393
10-17-2007, 10:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ya
Dealer: ratoneBR shows [As
3c] Dealer: xSCWx shows [Ac 7d] Dealer: ratoneBR shows three of a kind, Sevens Dealer: xSCWx shows four of a kind, Sevens Dealer: xSCWx wins the pot (2,310) with four of a kind, Sevens ratoneBR: lol xSCWx: mete un GOLLLLLLLL |
|
#395
10-18-2007, 02:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ya
[ QUOTE ]
OMG MY NINTENDO WII JUST ARRIVED FROM POKERSTARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] the metroid game is tyte too |
|
#399
10-18-2007, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ya
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] LOL I got offered a $5k stake to play 5/10nl while playing live 1/2 today by a player at the table. [/ QUOTE ] please tell me you accepted [/ QUOTE ] Tell him what you want, but please tell ME you declined, and that when you decide to play 5/10 (if you haven't already), that you won't have to split the profit. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
|
#400
10-18-2007, 10:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ya
yawn... it's been a while since i've posted a crying post, but these rivers are always so frusterating ;p
Full Tilt Poker Game #3891203554: $88 + $4 Heads Up Sit & Go (29617977), Table 1 - 25/50 - No Limit Hold'em - 10:00:02 ET - 2007/10/18 Seat 1: PrimordialAA (995) Seat 2: rumnchess (2,005) rumnchess posts the small blind of 25 PrimordialAA posts the big blind of 50 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to PrimordialAA [9s 8s] rumnchess calls 25 PrimordialAA checks *** FLOP *** [3s 8h 8d] PrimordialAA checks rumnchess bets 100 PrimordialAA raises to 200 rumnchess raises to 1,955, and is all in PrimordialAA calls 745, and is all in rumnchess shows [4s 4d] PrimordialAA shows [9s 8s] Uncalled bet of 1,010 returned to rumnchess *** TURN *** [3s 8h 8d] [7h] *** RIVER *** [3s 8h 8d 7h] [4h] rumnchess shows a full house, Fours full of Eights PrimordialAA shows three of a kind, Eights rumnchess wins the pot (1,990) with a full house, Fours full of Eights PrimordialAA stands up rumnchess stands up *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 1,990 | Rake 0 Board: [3s 8h 8d 7h 4h] Seat 1: PrimordialAA (big blind) showed [9s 8s] and lost with three of a kind, Eights Seat 2: rumnchess (small blind) showed [4s 4d] and won (1,990) with a full house, Fours full of Eights and btw, why would it EVER be a good idea for an obviously winning player with a pretty deep bankroll to take a stake like that, I mean I understand you can move up and maybe if your getting 50% make a decent amount more also... who would wanna get involved with live stakes with weird vegas people ;p, bad idea from the get go. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
