#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
[ QUOTE ]
I assure you, he's not bluffing. [/ QUOTE ] congratulations, you solved the thread! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
[ QUOTE ]
Any idea what his range is for calling a open from a guy with 25 BBs is? I wouldn't even be that surprised if he showed up with QQ-AA here. [/ QUOTE ] In hindsight, AA and QQ make the most sense. ATs and TT didn't. Low flushes didn't, he didn't really have that euro-cocky call a lot of junk in position against squeeze plays vibe about him. Then 99 88 77 66 i'm not so sure, maybe to likely. So if 99 - 66 are possible that brings it down to if he would bluff 13% of the time (24 combos * 0.127 = 3 vs 6 combos of sets, enough to call). From his point of view i think it's clear i have JJ AJ KoJh possibily 99h. I'm not really sure if he's expecting a call or not so i guess he may not bluff here, but then again i'm not confident in that either, i feel i would bluff both streets w/ those hands if it was me. So yea, i'm still not sure on the play. Results were he had QQ. I guess if i was good i would have bluffed the river. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
ty for making me look like a genius. Tough hand though
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
yea, v good post.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
who was villain
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OH O
really interesting hand
|
|
|