|
|
#31
10-20-2007, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars 320 vs Tsoprano
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] sinse his stack is somewhat big the risk he has a huge hand is smaller, but he called an UTG raise UTG+1 so it cannot be ignored. I never said I assumed he had QQ+.. [/ QUOTE ] well to think QQ is close you'd have to think his flatting range is pretty narrow [/ QUOTE ] the risk that he has a huge hand cannot just be ignored (which you did when prove why QQ was such a clear push) and therefor QQ is not a clear push by any means, that was my point. 
|
|
#32
10-20-2007, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 320 vs Tsoprano
Tsop isnt a squeezer. He is very tight and straight forward. His range is really small here, i would fold and be happy about it. Not saying he is not capable of leveling, but im pretty sure you are 33% or so against his range
|
|
#33
10-20-2007, 08:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Stars 320 vs Tsoprano
[ QUOTE ]
the risk that he has a huge hand cannot just be ignored (which you did when prove why QQ was such a clear push) and therefor QQ is not a clear push by any means, that was my point. [/ QUOTE ] The Utg+1 caller is CL at table and has 64K. He's a random who's calling a 2800 raise. He has tons of hands there. Putting him on some narrow range because it's an UTG raise and he's UTG+1, is a mistake.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
