#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 44 isn't folding to a turn bet [/ QUOTE ] If you say so. I would typically just bet this flop but I just feel like if villain goes into the hand thinking "set value" it doesn't really matter when you bet. edit: and if you really think 44 isn't folding to a turn bet why don't we just autocheck ever flop with an overpair, bet turn, shove river and get snapcalled by fifth pair? [/ QUOTE ] I don't think 47/6 call PF with any plans like playing for set value. Its more like "I has a pair, lets see what happens, oh he's bluffing since he didn't bet the flop!". About your second point, when did I say anything about 44 not folding to a river bet? The point is that it is easier for him to call turn with a bluff catcher and force us to fire a 2nd barrel, where we won't know whether he has 44/Qx/Jx or better. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m trying this new thing called: checking
fire the flop , then let go
|
|
|