|
|
#31
10-07-2007, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i just don't understand the community love groupthink. i think adsman is probably in the top 3 OOT posters but if he started doing [censored] like the OP and someone banned him, i guarantee NONE OF THE OOT MODS would come here and say.. aw come on guys, he's a really good poster trust me!! [/ QUOTE ] This is true. But it is Dids's forum and if he feels a 5 day ban is fine shouldnt that be the end of the discussion? [/ QUOTE ] yes, note i have no problem with dids and/or his judgment no harm in discussion though, and i made this thread before any action had even been taken. 
|
|
#32
10-07-2007, 02:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i just don't understand the community love groupthink. i think adsman is probably in the top 3 OOT posters but if he started doing [censored] like the OP and someone banned him, i guarantee NONE OF THE OOT MODS would come here and say.. aw come on guys, he's a really good poster trust me!! [/ QUOTE ] You edited this. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, i misspelled adsman, that was it.. were you trying to catch me in some kind of sherlock holmes a-ha! moment?
|
|
#33
10-07-2007, 02:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] as many times as he has been suspended, he still has a custom title. So [censored] retarded. [/ QUOTE ] One doesn't really have anything to do with the other [/ QUOTE ] Custom titles are supposed to be "rewards" to good posters. He isn't a good poster if he is too [censored] stupid to not keep getting banned. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that there's never been an policy of going back and taking away titles when people get banned.
|
|
#34
10-07-2007, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] as many times as he has been suspended, he still has a custom title. So [censored] retarded. [/ QUOTE ] One doesn't really have anything to do with the other [/ QUOTE ] Custom titles are supposed to be "rewards" to good posters. He isn't a good poster if he is too [censored] stupid to not keep getting banned. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that there's never been an policy of going back and taking away titles when people get banned. [/ QUOTE ] soooo.... lets discuss this. Your right its never been a policy, but I think we should make it one.
|
|
#38
10-07-2007, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i just don't understand the community love groupthink. i think adsman is probably in the top 3 OOT posters but if he started doing [censored] like the OP and someone banned him, i guarantee NONE OF THE OOT MODS would come here and say.. aw come on guys, he's a really good poster trust me!! [/ QUOTE ] You edited this. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, i misspelled adsman, that was it.. were you trying to catch me in some kind of sherlock holmes a-ha! moment? [/ QUOTE ] Nay. I could've swore the last line said 'cut him some slack' and not 'he's a really good poster...' and I was going to respond to that. Anyhow, nobody is going to bat for that thread, but they are saying a person shouldn't be judged by their worst post or biggest mistake. That's why I gave that little jab about the 'qft' debacle. You wouldn't want a history of sound judgments to be sullied by one poor judgment.
|
|
#39
10-07-2007, 05:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how is this guy not banned?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i just don't understand the community love groupthink. i think adsman is probably in the top 3 OOT posters but if he started doing [censored] like the OP and someone banned him, i guarantee NONE OF THE OOT MODS would come here and say.. aw come on guys, he's a really good poster trust me!! [/ QUOTE ] You edited this. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, i misspelled adsman, that was it.. were you trying to catch me in some kind of sherlock holmes a-ha! moment? [/ QUOTE ] Nay. I could've swore the last line said 'cut him some slack' and not 'he's a really good poster...' and I was going to respond to that. Anyhow, nobody is going to bat for that thread, but they are saying a person shouldn't be judged by their worst post or biggest mistake. That's why I gave that little jab about the 'qft' debacle. You wouldn't want a history of sound judgments to be sullied by one poor judgment. [/ QUOTE ] qft
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
