Free Nath - Page 4

keikiwai · #31 10-04-2007, 05:15 AM

kipin · #32 10-04-2007, 05:18 AM

Thay3r back in week 1 proposed a trade to Jurollo that at the time seemed "fair".

Jurollo denied the trade via MSN instant messaging, but did not deny the trade online at the fantasy football website.

2 weeks later, Jurollo (after seeing the player is actually performing very well) accepts the trade (much to the bewilderment of Thay3r who is at least partially to blame here) and refuses to admit his move was slimey and why poker players are considered scum by pretty much all of the world.

He also proceeded to lie about having an interaction with Thay3r a week after the trade was denied via MSN that was a bit of taunting by Thay3r saying how he bet Jurollo wished he hadn't denied the trade earlier.

*note I am not involved with this fantasy football league in any way and all information was collected by me in the MTTc thread (started by shaundeeb) that has been locked.

rothko · #33 10-04-2007, 05:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I was told to come here for my free nath?

[/ QUOTE ]

i smiled imo

Labarde · #34 10-04-2007, 05:24 AM

his title was only changed to 'banned' in the last twenty minutes or so. When i went to look at the offending thread jjust before it was still 'ceo of gildcorp' or whatever.

im a detective imo

Diebetter · #35 10-04-2007, 05:27 AM

You should see the mod forum right now. Pandemonium.

keikiwai · #36 10-04-2007, 05:32 AM

[ QUOTE ]
You should see the mod forum right now. Pandemonium.

[/ QUOTE ]

it's not really a gimmick if you just post what he would post

mlagoo · #37 10-04-2007, 05:33 AM

wow

how [censored] weak. angling the [censored] out of someone then banning someone else for calling you out on it.

cue jurollostarr: "im sorry but what are you gonna do about it?"

ASPoker8 · #38 10-04-2007, 05:33 AM

While I love Nath, there are 2 things that happened which make the ban legitimate, despite sad.

1. The avatar he changed to right before he was banned.
2. Another matter which I would rather not talk about, but if you trust me, it was something deserving of a ban. If you don't trust me, don't ask, this is all i'm saying.

All in all, I think the ban can be justified by 2+2, but I REALLY hope its reversed or something gets worked out because I love Nath and think he is a very valuable poster.

Edit: I don't think the avatar was that bad, but I don't really remember it too well. Dunno.

rothko · #39 10-04-2007, 05:35 AM

ZBTHorton · #40 10-04-2007, 05:37 AM

I unbanned him.