|
View Poll Results: My best response: | |||
"Jason, what I meant is that given that picture of you, and the cuteness of your baby, your wife must be very attractive, because it had to come from somewhere. Sorry for the confusion." | 9 | 50.00% | |
"Yeah, what can I say, I'm into redheads." | 9 | 50.00% | |
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
EDD,
Whoa, chill out, Captain Sensitive. How can you post that much in BBV4L if you're gonna get sand in your vag over one random comment? I have never EVER derived value from the post views column. here or on any other forum. Why should I? It appears I'm not alone in this. And LOL at "OOT guys"...maybe 20% of my posts are in that forum. I also spam ATF, Golf, the Lounge, and Sports pretty relentlessly. To say the least, this seems like an extra dumb thing to get worked up over. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
was this why 2+2 was down all day? to make everything >1000? lame
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
I'm not getting worked up at all. I just dont see how you can say you want something gone thats actually useful to look at on this forum.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Boro,
this post is useless without regression |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
Boro, this post is useless without regression [/ QUOTE ] Eyeball it wimp. 50+/-15 replies per 1000 views. R^2 of about 0.6. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
EDD,
Liar, you are out of control. ATF Survivor? Loser can't masturbate until they are good and ready. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
Or at least make it ">1K". You're wasting two precious characters of column width. [/ QUOTE ] I tried to post this before the other thread got locked. The view counts are really only important to find out if anyone has been reading your post. But above 1K it really doesn't matter. You could make a seperate category of 100K or 1M, but ">1000" looks retarded. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My point is that 1000 is a ridiculous number to use for this purpose. It would be like polling the site to find out what stakes NL people play and the options being ".05/.10, .10/.25, .25/.50, .50/1+" [/ QUOTE ] That seems like a perfectly reasonable question to me. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Yeah... damn it, I don't have the energy to correct you or be funny back. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Boro, this post is useless without regression [/ QUOTE ] Eyeball it wimp. 50+/-15 replies per 1000 views. R^2 of about 0.6. [/ QUOTE ] I ran the numbers. 49+/-10 replies per 1000 views. R^2 = 0.59. I must be getting old. |
|
|