Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:03 AM
nath nath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tone
Posts: 22,162
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry but I personally hate Silent Mike ... I don't think he is making any real analysis just deciding on random gut feelings and has gotten lucky a few times.

[/ QUOTE ]
You're wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:10 AM
Kirbynator Kirbynator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 924
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry but I personally hate Silent Mike ... I don't think he is making any real analysis just deciding on random gut feelings and has gotten lucky a few times.

[/ QUOTE ]
You're wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

im pretty sure hes right. I dont hate him but he just looks like a fish making the right moves at the right time (with usually easy decisions)
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:17 AM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: north american scum
Posts: 11,413
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
Harman is like one of those uber nits at my tables with 10/5/3 stats, if she bets, just get out of the way.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure this is the impression she wants people to have of her. She clearly plays much tighter on TV than in her regular games, in which she has a lot of fold equity from oblivious people who think "she's tight, she must have me" and muck. If you listen to Todd Brunson and Barry Greenstein, they'll tell you something different about how much of a rock she actually is.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:26 AM
TheDna TheDna is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 106
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Harman is like one of those uber nits at my tables with 10/5/3 stats, if she bets, just get out of the way.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure this is the impression she wants people to have of her. She clearly plays much tighter on TV than in her regular games, in which she has a lot of fold equity from oblivious people who think "she's tight, she must have me" and muck. If you listen to Todd Brunson and Barry Greenstein, they'll tell you something different about how much of a rock she actually is.

[/ QUOTE ]

She can actually be super agro and bluff you off with total air, if you saw what she did with Antonio in the old episodes you would not talk like shes a nit. She [censored] destroyed him hand after hand..

She wasnt mother that time i think it changed her in certain ways, but she is still much better then most nits and very capable of making moves without a hand.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:35 AM
KSOT KSOT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Daniel Laruso\'s gonna fight??!
Posts: 4,944
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

I believe her when she says she hasn't been dealt anything playable. Season 2 was enough to convince me she can flip the switch if she wants to.

Can you blame her for trying to play straightforward at a table with Farha and Elezera?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:36 AM
deaders deaders is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Perth, AU
Posts: 3,362
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

this episode sucked big time. the sam farha donk-fest, if I wanted to watch retards go all in with 2nd pair id play a $5 donk'ngo.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 09-25-2007, 06:38 AM
TheDna TheDna is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 106
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

agree with sammy stupid table donater [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Noone has to play for real just because sammy donates them all a huge winrate. "all-in in the dark" ffs ..
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:30 AM
RichGangi RichGangi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 965
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry but I personally hate Silent Mike. He's only made one good play calling Phil's bluff with 3rd pair or whatever. Besides that he has made some "good" calls with top pair etc but I honestly believe that he would call in these spots just as often when he's beat. I don't think he is making any real analysis just deciding on random gut feelings and has gotten lucky a few times. I would not be suprised if he sticks around for a few more games/seasons that he will overall be making some bad plays, and equally bad calls to his "good" calls with top pair no kicker.

Anybody else want to comment on him or someone else, instead of talking about the commonly already way redudant talk about Eli and Farha, and of course Jamie Gold.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are way off here. Silent Mike is a good poker player. Put up ~$500,000 and play him. Take down that uber-fish. LOLZ.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 09-25-2007, 08:58 AM
Bonified Bonified is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slave to the grind
Posts: 471
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

[ QUOTE ]
Next time Hellmuth wants to stop the game to ask for insurance, he should be kicked in the nads.

[/ QUOTE ]

Could be worse - it could be a WSOP final table, and you on a short stack with the clock running. I still can't believe no one complained about it at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 09-25-2007, 09:10 AM
FGators FGators is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,339
Default Re: High Stakes Poker thread (9/24) (Spoilers in Thread to come?)

Jennifer Harman needs one beer to get going. Somebody supply the drinks or get her out of that seat.

And Sammy Farha has NOT gotten better at NLHE since season one. His NLHE game is super weak.

More and more I feel like people I play with at $2/4 NL can absolutely smoke this game.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.