|
|
#33
08-24-2007, 06:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
would it be possible to make such a system specific to sub-forums? because i can see how BBV posters wouldn't really want OOTiots rating them (and vice versa). [/ QUOTE ] I have no idea how the software logistics would work, but that definitely sounds good. It would work out well for the strat forums as well. A well seasoned LHE player would have a great repuation in the high stakes limit forums, but should not be automatically accepted as a great NLHE poster. They would have to prove themself there as well. 
|
|
#34
08-24-2007, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
I doubt that would be a problem. If BBV people aren't posting in OOT, then they won't be on the radar screen for OOT readers. [/ QUOTE ] you're right, a forum that starts near-daily threads about how bad OOT is and routinely produces multi-account trolls would have no interest in dicking around with that same forum by gaming a rating system. it's not like these people have a ton of time on their hands, mischief on their minds or the will to complete such a task. i like BBV a lot, and the posters who would do something like this are not the ones i think of as good posters there. so this isn't a 'F BBV' post, it's a 'F that segment of BBV that has nothing better to do than complain about OOT because they think it's cool' post.
|
|
#35
08-24-2007, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
I think this whole thing is lame because it becomes an internet circle jerk. I had a much longer post typed out but whacked all of it. Also, I think it's hard for noobs to get noticed even when they have a good idea, and this just makes it that much harder and could discourage quality posters from regging.
If a poster sucks that should be recognizable without any rating system.
|
|
#36
08-24-2007, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
I think this whole thing is lame because it becomes an internet circle jerk. I had a much longer post typed out but whacked all of it. Also, I think it's hard for noobs to get noticed even when they have a good idea, and this just makes it that much harder and could discourage quality posters from regging. If a poster sucks that should be recognizable without any rating system. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#38
08-24-2007, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
I think this whole thing is lame because it becomes an internet circle jerk. I had a much longer post typed out but whacked all of it. Also, I think it's hard for noobs to get noticed even when they have a good idea, and this just makes it that much harder and could discourage quality posters from regging. If a poster sucks that should be recognizable without any rating system. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#39
08-24-2007, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
What exactly do we do with the rep points? Cash them in for 2+2 stress balls? Will that count against my MGR? [/ QUOTE ] You build up your rep points so you can later rip off other posters in a Stars for Full Tilt money exchange, obv.
|
|
#40
08-24-2007, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Alternative to the * system
[ QUOTE ]
I think this whole thing is lame because it becomes an internet circle jerk. I had a much longer post typed out but whacked all of it. Also, I think it's hard for noobs to get noticed even when they have a good idea, and this just makes it that much harder and could discourage quality posters from regging. If a poster sucks that should be recognizable without any rating system. [/ QUOTE ] Yep. To add, I'm active on another forum where they have this and it's just the suck. It doesn't mean anything to the quality posters and it means the world to the crap posters.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
