![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just want to commend all you tight players. This is by far the best way you can play, AFAIC.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most nits are losers. The strategy itself is breakeven, but some may be slight winners with rakeback or bonuses.
![]() |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I just want to commend all you tight players. This is by far the best way you can play, AFAIC. [/ QUOTE ] While us nits are focused on tearing up the last 3 fish online, diebitter is chipping away at us bit by bit so we don't even notice. NH. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I just want to commend all you tight players. This is by far the best way you can play, AFAIC. [/ QUOTE ] While us nits are focused on tearing up the last 3 fish online, diebitter is chipping away at us bit by bit so we don't even notice. NH. [/ QUOTE ] Not really. If I see a Lag that is obviously not a maniac or call station and he's multi-tabling I know exactly what he's trying to do. Though at 50 NL I have so far encountered only one good 8 tabling Lag 32/10/2.1 |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Most nits are losers. The strategy itself is breakeven , but some may be slight winners with rakeback or bonuses. [/ QUOTE ] Any starting hand strategy can be profitable if you know how to play it right post flop. For example, obviously the tighter you are pf the trickier you have to be post flop or it will be obvious when you have a hand and when you don't. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I disagree.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Most nits are losers. The strategy itself is breakeven, but some may be slight winners with rakeback or bonuses. ![]() [/ QUOTE ] u think i be? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hey guys again. I do not use pokertracker or Pahud those programs but have it installed the applications. I know i can use this up to 1000 hands and pahud for 300? Well my question is since i can use it for a trial period... does it display those stats such as aggressiion, V$ip those stats in the free trial version?
Note, i play full ring without those things and would be willing to try. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I disagree. [/ QUOTE ] Why? Because of some stats in your database? You didn't really give anything else to justify your statement. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
hey guys again. I do not use pokertracker or Pahud those programs but have it installed the applications. I know i can use this up to 1000 hands and pahud for 300? Well my question is since i can use it for a trial period... does it display those stats such as aggressiion, V$ip those stats in the free trial version? Note, i play full ring without those things and would be willing to try. [/ QUOTE ] If I recall correctly the trial of PA HUD does one table only. So you can display all those things, but only on one table, not all your tables. The 1000 hands in PT will be more limiting. You won't have more than a few hundred hands on any one villain, and thus the stats that are displayed will not be very useful. I would recommend both tools. |
![]() |
|
|