|
|
#31
04-23-2007, 03:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Official Stars $650 Qualifier
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not deep so calling for a set is incorrect. [/ QUOTE ] this implies utg1 a) knows your range is QQ+, b) knows he doesn't have set value, c) cares i raise to like 1700 and fold to utg shove 
|
|
#32
04-23-2007, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars $650 Qualifier
[ QUOTE ]
this implies utg1 a) knows your range is QQ+, b) knows he doesn't have set value, c) cares i raise to like 1700 and fold to utg shove [/ QUOTE ] You're more right than I am on this, but I think 1500 accomplishes the same as 1700, but 1250 is a little too low.
|
|
#33
04-23-2007, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars $650 Qualifier
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm not deep so calling for a set is incorrect. [/ QUOTE ] this implies utg1 a) knows your range is QQ+, b) knows he doesn't have set value, c) cares i raise to like 1700 and fold to utg shove [/ QUOTE ] holy [censored] you cant fold after putting in that much dude. Hed have to have only AA KK like always for that to be correct. edit: that means there is 4000+1750 in the pot and its 1750 to call. 3.3-1
|
|
#34
04-23-2007, 10:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Official Stars $650 Qualifier
[ QUOTE ]
I am giving 3-1 on the call, but that's ok given the lack of implied odds. edit: I'm not deep so calling for a set is incorrect. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't this pretty close? Looks like implied odds are 750 to win 2325 + 3335 = 5660. Looks like 7.55:1. Not quite right, but he's got 100 BBs. Obviously need to raise more.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
