UB game softness - Page 4

questions · #31 04-16-2007, 10:31 AM

[ QUOTE ]
I like UB and have done well. I took a break when I found myself 8 topping 100NL with 5 other guys on every table I was on.

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't like money, huh? [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

questions · #32 04-16-2007, 10:32 AM

I also like UB. I find the software is lightning fast and the mini-view makes it simple to multi-table. Tables can be tight, though, I'll admit. I can never get anything going at either PS or FTP, so I stay away from them.

Stake Monster · #33 04-16-2007, 03:10 PM

I switched to Party yesterday, they have the worse player base ever so it made sense. I miss the UB software already though, nothing beats it in terms of speed/graphics/simplicity. I'll just stick on UB til I clear my bonus, there's simply not enough games going on UB to make it profitable (due to lack of table selection).

Beastmaster · #34 04-16-2007, 03:42 PM

their 6max limit games are real passive up to 5/10...ha

boondoggle · #35 04-16-2007, 04:27 PM

lol..right. PS/FTP are much softer/easier to play against.

cheers
Boon

oakley77 · #36 04-16-2007, 04:39 PM

I have found that UB games are softer than FT regarding 3/6 and 5/10NL games. It seems like FT tables always have a huge waiting list and have at least 2 good regs on each table.

boondoggle · #37 04-16-2007, 09:41 PM

Have you played on UB lately..what 3/6 or 5/10 NL games 6max are you talking about?????

With FTP/PS table selection..the games at both of these sites are much easier.

cheers
Boon

boondoggle · #38 04-22-2007, 06:37 PM

Played some tables of 6max today at UB. The avg vp$ip was <25 on all of them. I am pulling my money out of UB. UB has become the new absolute due to the bonus whores just nut peddling.

cheers
Boon

Stake Monster · #39 04-22-2007, 07:24 PM

you should play on Party if you can, it's ridiculously fishy. </brag>