Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: #1: 97s
Play 64 92.75%
Don't play 5 7.25%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:28 PM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Shooting 37% from the field but 15-17 from the line means they score at will now? Let me guess, Drew N. had an amazing game last night too shooting 9-27 with 5 A and 4 TO?

MSU is a "good" defensive team yet we shot 48% from the field. But we only hit 25-34 from the line. If we shot 88% like MSU, would that make you feel better about UNC?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:30 PM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: THATSATOOMANY!!!!
Posts: 17,935
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

So, bottom line, how do you rank the top 5 conferences, in order?
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:32 PM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Based on the tourney?

SEC > Pac-10 > B12 > BE > ACC > B10
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:33 PM
James282 James282 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,309
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Clark, I'd like to take this time to remind you that you owe me 100$ from a duke/unc last longer bet that you've never followed through on!

James

EDIT: I'll accept payments to gonores, or payments in person when I am there in July!
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:34 PM
hoyasnaxa hoyasnaxa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,054
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

[ QUOTE ]
Based on the tourney?

SEC > Pac-10 > B12 > BE > ACC > B10

[/ QUOTE ]

That is a pretty good ranking I would say, Pac-10 could be switched with B12 also I think. B10 definitely the most pathetic of all.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:39 PM
Clarkmeister Clarkmeister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: THATSATOOMANY!!!!
Posts: 17,935
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Don't even remember it. I'll get on it.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:39 PM
chaseUdown chaseUdown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 520
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Tech as a 10 seed was a joke. They were 2.5 point favorites over UNLV. They played poorly and lost. Maryland was 5.5 point favorites over Butler. They played bad and lost. Bad showing for those 2 teams.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:42 PM
capone0 capone0 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,906
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

[ QUOTE ]
Tech as a 10 seed was a joke. They were 2.5 point favorites over UNLV. They played poorly and lost. Maryland was 5.5 point favorites over Butler. They played bad and lost. Bad showing for those 2 teams.

[/ QUOTE ]

Tech wasn't that good. Did you even check their record away from Atlanta? Please look it up for me.

Maryland didn't play well, I don't really have an excuse for them e/c Butler is a pretty solid squad.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:43 PM
hoyasnaxa hoyasnaxa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NoVA
Posts: 2,054
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

Butler is terrible, Maryland should have killed them.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-18-2007, 09:43 PM
chaseUdown chaseUdown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 520
Default Re: March Madness: Sweet 16 discussion thread

If Tech wasn't that good please explain why they were 2.5 point favorties over UNLV?

EDIT: To add, Maryland should of handled the Butler squad that thrives on the 3 ball. Maryland was 7th in the nation defending the 3. Butler shot 48% yesterday, just a horrible defensive game by them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.