#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
nh, shame about the missclick on the flop.
I dont mind the preflop line but the reason for this is to get it in on most flops, and this is as dry as you get. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
I just want to reiterate a point made earlier: your preflop play is inconsistent with your flop play, and that's the biggest mistake you made in this hand.
Folding to the preflop three-bet against this opponent isn't a huge mistake -- I think you're probably giving up value, but only a few BBs on average, so it's not that big a deal. However, calling preflop and then playing for set value and folding to a c-bet on a dry-as-a-bone board is giving up far more value. Make up your mind preflop: are you going to the felt on this one or not? If you're not willing to commit your stack on a safe board then fold preflop. If you ARE willing to commit, then realize that your smooth-call preflop is setting a trap, and CRAI that flop (and any other aceless flop). KK can be an incredibly profitable hand if played correctly, or it can be a frustrating and unprofitable hand if played badly. Part of playing it correctly is knowing when to get away from a hand. In this case I wouldn't have a big problem with you folding preflop, and I wouldn't have a any problem with you pushing the flop, but I'm very unhappy to see you play KK for set value at a price of over 10% of your effective stack. Had the preflop three-bet been a minraise, calling for set value would be +EV; at this price, you lose money in the long run by playing the way you did. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
I agree folding against him - i've gotten in pf with him three times - all three he had AA or KK.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure his PF 3bet range is wider than just AA...... Why not shove pre? [/ QUOTE ] i don't think it is. edit: and ya know, even if it is, i'm +EV against this guy in the long run i can find a better spot than this WA/WB situation [/ QUOTE ] So why post this if you don't care what people think? It's pretty obvious by your attitude that you're right and we're all wrong. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
[ QUOTE ]
I agree folding against him - i've gotten in pf with him three times - all three he had AA or KK. [/ QUOTE ] But does he 3bet wider than that? That is the real question here. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
ummm, i was gonna respond, but then i saw pokey's post, and he already said everything i had to say.
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
[ QUOTE ]
I just want to reiterate a point made earlier: your preflop play is inconsistent with your flop play, and that's the biggest mistake you made in this hand. Folding to the preflop three-bet against this opponent isn't a huge mistake -- I think you're probably giving up value, but only a few BBs on average, so it's not that big a deal. However, calling preflop and then playing for set value and folding to a c-bet on a dry-as-a-bone board is giving up far more value. Make up your mind preflop: are you going to the felt on this one or not? If you're not willing to commit your stack on a safe board then fold preflop. If you ARE willing to commit, then realize that your smooth-call preflop is setting a trap, and CRAI that flop (and any other aceless flop). KK can be an incredibly profitable hand if played correctly, or it can be a frustrating and unprofitable hand if played badly. Part of playing it correctly is knowing when to get away from a hand. In this case I wouldn't have a big problem with you folding preflop, and I wouldn't have a any problem with you pushing the flop, but I'm very unhappy to see you play KK for set value at a price of over 10% of your effective stack. Had the preflop three-bet been a minraise, calling for set value would be +EV; at this price, you lose money in the long run by playing the way you did. [/ QUOTE ] good points. i'll keep this in mind for when we're both ~2 buyins deep next time. i hadn't actually considered folding pre. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
Pokey is SUCH a genius.
Everything he said, especially about the inconsistent call/fold line. You screwed the pooch on this hand. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
[ QUOTE ]
I just want to reiterate a point made earlier: your preflop play is inconsistent with your flop play, and that's the biggest mistake you made in this hand. Folding to the preflop three-bet against this opponent isn't a huge mistake -- I think you're probably giving up value, but only a few BBs on average, so it's not that big a deal. However, calling preflop and then playing for set value and folding to a c-bet on a dry-as-a-bone board is giving up far more value. Make up your mind preflop: are you going to the felt on this one or not? If you're not willing to commit your stack on a safe board then fold preflop. If you ARE willing to commit, then realize that your smooth-call preflop is setting a trap, and CRAI that flop (and any other aceless flop). KK can be an incredibly profitable hand if played correctly, or it can be a frustrating and unprofitable hand if played badly. Part of playing it correctly is knowing when to get away from a hand. In this case I wouldn't have a big problem with you folding preflop, and I wouldn't have a any problem with you pushing the flop, but I'm very unhappy to see you play KK for set value at a price of over 10% of your effective stack. Had the preflop three-bet been a minraise, calling for set value would be +EV; at this price, you lose money in the long run by playing the way you did. [/ QUOTE ] dammit pokey - I was about to write a long winded post about how this might well be a spot where folding KK pre was goot - and that pre/flop play is out of synch and you beat me to it. I'll just quote yours again for extra emphasis. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50nl i NEVER fold kings...
Note: Wild Bill has 4bet me with JJ and rode dirtay when I pushed Axs.
So he might be retarded. |
|
|