|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Have you paid for porn on the internet? | |||
| Yes, frequently |
   
|
17 | 3.94% |
| Yes, rarely. |
  
|
122 | 28.31% |
| No, but I would consider it. |
  
|
56 | 12.99% |
| Pay for porn, are you crazy? |
  
|
236 | 54.76% |
| Voters: 431. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
02-23-2007, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
Jay Cohen,
The US Govt dropped Party, not the reverse. You think you deserve applause for keeping your site open after Oct 13th? I would be the 1st one to join Party if they came back. Party is the best poker room on the planet and they will be #1 again before year end. Don't bash PartyPoker because they are being responsible and knowing when to fold a losing hand. 
|
|
#32
02-23-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
Heck, I'd go back to my ex-girlfriend if the judge would lift the restraining order...wait, I've said too much.
|
|
#34
02-23-2007, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
Thinly veiled Party-bashing poll?
Jay, you know better than to try and drum up customers by bashing the competition. It's just bad business. If you want more business, offer the best overall product. If you want more 2+2ers, offer the most fish. If you want more fish, advertize better.
|
|
#35
02-23-2007, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
Interesting, I thought the poll would go this way, just not as strong.
I read this forum as someone who is very interested in this industry, not to solicit business or promote WSEX. The tag line on my name was put there by a mod who appreciated what I tried to do in my battle with the US. A scumbag? I don't think so.
|
|
#36
02-23-2007, 07:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
Important factor: will there still be unmentionable for us US players if we go back?
|
|
#37
02-23-2007, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
[ QUOTE ]
World Sports/Poker Exchange, whose founder started this thread, has gone farther out of their way to support "us" than any other gambling entity, yet only a couple of hundred of "us" make their way to play cards there any given day. [/ QUOTE ] As soon as they put names back in the Hand Histories and stop pushing customers away.....
|
|
#40
02-23-2007, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who here would go back to Party after they abandoned the market?
[ QUOTE ]
As soon as they put names back in the Hand Histories and stop pushing customers away..... [/ QUOTE ] How are they pushing customers away? WPX runs a positive sum game for poker players. WPX loses money on the poker room while Party, Stars, FTP, etc. pull hundreds of millions, if not billions, out of the poker economy, out of player's pockets. WPX is the only entity putting downward pressure on the substantial and nonsensical cost of playing poker online. None of the other sites compete on the basis of cost. Does anyone think that's a coincidence? Is there any reason why a 10 tourney costs a dollar and a $200 tourney costs $20 across the board at every site? Please explain how not allowing data mining and HUDs via WPX's hand history policy is greater handicap than pulling untold millions from the games annually? How is Jay Cohen getting criticized for running a loss leader which offers substantial benefit to the players who play at his site?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
