#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
I got a 120 and by far my lowest score was tournament play. I also seem to suck at big pairs. I did decent with small pairs, hand selection, and comp. speed.
I suck at life. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
This score is better than 78.81% of all persons taking this test. You should expect to win in low to mid stakes NL holde'em games.
If only it was that simple. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
107 holla!
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
I must definitely be a donkey. Is it just me or were the majority of the situations in the live game questions, the type where you just want to puke when they happen in real life? Got a 97 btw.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
got 107...so average I guess
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are you a donkey?
[ QUOTE ]
Someone posted a thread about this test a few weeks ago. Apparently the time you take to answer everything has a huge impact on your score. [/ QUOTE ] I took the test twice to see the affect of the computational speed score. First time I received a 54%. The 2nd time I took the test, I selected the same answers for every question and ended up w/ a computational speed of 100%. The difference in my two scores was 1 point. [ QUOTE ] IIRC, some people tried the test twice -- once slowly and carefully, the second very quickly and picking random (or near random) answers. Their fast score exceeded their careful slow one. [/ QUOTE ] You can't change two variables (#1: answers you selected & #2: speed) and conclude that the change in results is solely due to the change in one of the variables. That's stupid. You have to isolate the variable you want to examine. [ QUOTE ] So I wouldn't take much out of the results of this thing... [/ QUOTE ] I wouldn't either, but not for the reason you provided. |
|
|