Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Community
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-16-2007, 02:52 PM
yellowdoyle yellowdoyle is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 1,625
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

I got a 120 and by far my lowest score was tournament play. I also seem to suck at big pairs. I did decent with small pairs, hand selection, and comp. speed.

I suck at life.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-16-2007, 03:10 PM
HojoMofo HojoMofo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 415
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

This score is better than 78.81% of all persons taking this test. You should expect to win in low to mid stakes NL holde'em games.


If only it was that simple.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-16-2007, 03:28 PM
EvanJC EvanJC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: way down deep
Posts: 4,175
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

107 holla!
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-16-2007, 05:45 PM
Toro Toro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: one down two to go
Posts: 6,849
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

I must definitely be a donkey. Is it just me or were the majority of the situations in the live game questions, the type where you just want to puke when they happen in real life? Got a 97 btw.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-16-2007, 05:49 PM
BadLieutenant BadLieutenant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: romania
Posts: 346
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

got 107...so average I guess
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-16-2007, 07:05 PM
mikeJ mikeJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Back to Berkeley
Posts: 2,065
Default Re: Are you a donkey?

[ QUOTE ]
Someone posted a thread about this test a few weeks ago. Apparently the time you take to answer everything has a huge impact on your score.

[/ QUOTE ]

I took the test twice to see the affect of the computational speed score. First time I received a 54%. The 2nd time I took the test, I selected the same answers for every question and ended up w/ a computational speed of 100%. The difference in my two scores was 1 point.

[ QUOTE ]
IIRC, some people tried the test twice -- once slowly and carefully, the second very quickly and picking random (or near random) answers. Their fast score exceeded their careful slow one.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can't change two variables (#1: answers you selected & #2: speed) and conclude that the change in results is solely due to the change in one of the variables. That's stupid. You have to isolate the variable you want to examine.

[ QUOTE ]
So I wouldn't take much out of the results of this thing...

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't either, but not for the reason you provided.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.