Where is the smart/sharp money going on the SB?

[PokerFink]

It's not 80/20, but the defense recovers a WR fumble more often than the offense. The further down the field, the more often the defense recovers.

[guids]

Where are you guys getting your info that the betting public is on the bears??

http://www.caribsports.com/docs/ALL.caribpicks.html

http://sportsbook.com/sportsbook/betting-trends.php


Ive also talked to a few local guys today, and they all show about teh same as the offshore websites.

[NajdorfDefense]

I'm just saying it's nowhere NEAR 4-1 against, in addition, many sideline fumbles go out of bounds and would be retained by the Offense.

[TheRover]

u23-115 looks OK

[NajdorfDefense]

I took o22.5 for small.

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm just saying it's nowhere NEAR 4-1 against, in addition, many sideline fumbles go out of bounds and would be retained by the Offense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah okay. I just made that number up. Sorry. I should've said a sig amount of fumbles get nabbed by defense.

[NajdorfDefense]

From your site:54% on Bears 86% on CHI moneyline! 68% on Over.
From wagerline, 56% on Bears ATS.

Bears have been big public play all year.

[Thremp]

[ QUOTE ]
From your site:54% on Bears 86% on CHI moneyline! 68% on Over.
From wagerline, 56% on Bears ATS.

Bears have been big public play all year.

[/ QUOTE ]

The line moved off the 7 as well. Seems like a std move.

[rjp]

IMO wagerline is useless for the Super Bowl. Everyone comes out of the woodwork to bet on the SB and many of them have never heard of wagerline. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[NajdorfDefense]

Again, Bears were big public play all year.
ML on Colts dropped from -260 to -200/210 by gametime.
Line dropped from 7/7.5 to 6.5 much earlier in week.

Sharps were not taking CHI -6.5.