I folded quads today - Page 4

gambler2k4 · #31 01-27-2007, 08:26 PM

sorry, I hadn't read any of the previous replies.

winterGT · #32 01-27-2007, 08:29 PM

[ QUOTE ]
sorry, I hadn't read any of the previous replies.

[/ QUOTE ]
or any of 2+2, judging from your reply..

Eagles · #33 01-27-2007, 08:42 PM

Foxwoods,

Do you realize that your title is misleading? I mean you only folded a pair of aces not quads.

foxw00ds player · #34 01-27-2007, 08:42 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
nice fold still

[/ QUOTE ]
ummm, no. he had quads.

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm, no. he had aces when he folded, what comes afterward is pointless. Good fold wish I could play as good as you.

bulldogs24 · #35 01-27-2007, 09:23 PM

wouldnt u have tripled up since two OTHER players were in the hand?

keikiwai · #36 01-27-2007, 09:39 PM

do you realize that when you folded you didn't have quads?

HEK · #37 01-27-2007, 10:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
umm you folded a pair of aces, not qauds.

i know where your coming from, but techincally alls you folded was a pair of aces.

[/ QUOTE ]

the first person who wrote this i assumed was sarcastic. the more people that post this the more i realize you guys think i'm not aware that AA on a 568 board is not four of a kind. for the record, i realize i didn't actually fold quads.

[/ QUOTE ]

don't start backpeddling now. You thought you folded quads just admit it.

KingNeo · #38 01-27-2007, 10:54 PM

You guys are retarded.

He folded his quads on the flop because if the 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] , 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] , 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], or 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] hits then the straight flush is out there.

Learn to play.

NorthernGuy · #39 01-28-2007, 01:13 AM

You didn't fold quads. You folded an overpair, that's all.

mikech · #40 01-28-2007, 01:50 AM

hey philosophy major, scenarios like this are actually something i've been thinking about lately. on one hand, i feel that the universe would've reacted differently if you'd called or gone all-in, that there's some kind of quantum-physical indeterminacy even to a shuffled deck and you wouldn't (necessarily) have made quads, but the other side of the argument is that the deck was already established, so your action could not have affected it. what's your serious opinion on this?