![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It's a pretty clear call. Just expect some variance. [/ QUOTE ] lol. Yeah, that variance between the misclick with garbage and the actual Quads is crazy. And again, he isn't a set miner, he's tricky and LAGgy for FR. A very solid player. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It doesnt seem like anyone has mentioned this, but call preflop, not raise. It's an adjustment that all us 6-max players have to make when playing full-ring - toning down the preflop aggression. [/ QUOTE ] meh. Even though it's FR you don't have to be a pansy about it. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have more of a problem with raising this preflop and then checking this flop around.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] do you think a 15-6 nit limp calls with 56 in early position? your reply is worthless, as you provide no reasoing or math and simply a random hand a nit doesnt have. [/ QUOTE ] Well if he limps with 78s then he probably limps with 56s. As for providing math.... what are you kidding???? oh, and next time remind me not to bother replying to one of your posts. [/ QUOTE ] QFT *doesn't reply to OP* |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's either a misclick or you're beat, for sure, and I don't think he'd play 444 so slow. His turn bet is super weak and I'd expect him to bet more here, even with $400 behind, to build the pot. It can easily be a $94 bet that got [censored] up by a misclick, or he wants it to look like that and he has Quads.
I don't fold, though. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
This looks a ton like a misclick. He probably tried to bet 100 and ended up with 1000. I assume he is sane and set miners don't get paid by open shoving for 9x pot. [/ QUOTE ] yeah this is what im thinking as well |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i wud have played this hand much differently...but as played i would call... i am very curious about the results so please post them soon
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think we saw all the arguments and it's time for results.
I personally call this. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
It doesnt seem like anyone has mentioned this, but call preflop, not raise. It's an adjustment that all us 6-max players have to make when playing full-ring - toning down the preflop aggression. [/ QUOTE ] are you kidding me? i raise this all day long when i'm playing full ring. maybe it's borderline UTG...i'd prob still raise it there a decent amount |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey All. One thing to note is that it is NOT an all in. Thus it could not have been a misclick all in from him using a script erroneously. He left himself some random amount.
As per opponent specific reads, I have never played full ring but this player was on all my tables, seemed solid and nitty as a lot of posters have agreed with. As for raising 88 I guess I could go without it but I figured with how nitty Full Ring is raising + cbetting missed flops takes down a good amount of pots. I checked the flop because of the board texture and what I thought tight limp callers might have. As for the turn I meant to raise but was 9 tabling and ddint get a raise in. Had I raised to say 125 or so and he reraised to ~350, what does everyone do there? (this would have been better) When I got to the river I thought for the full time bank. |
![]() |
|
|