|
|
#31
11-06-2006, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
Ye, seems like tilt. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Definitely. 
|
|
#32
11-06-2006, 02:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
whats your total bankroll at now? [/ QUOTE ] ~65k
|
|
#34
11-06-2006, 04:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
Look at the bright side: when you get an NVG/BBV thread about being busto, you've made it.
|
|
#37
11-06-2006, 02:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
lol scary tiger plays 100-200 and 200-400 on a 65K bankroll? is that just his online money or something? [/ QUOTE ] Once upon a time, before the internet poker nerd was born when playing poker meant driving to a casino or finding a home game, a 200 BB bankroll was considered sufficient for LHE.
|
|
#38
11-06-2006, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
lol scary tiger plays 100-200 and 200-400 on a 65K bankroll? is that just his online money or something? [/ QUOTE ] I don't subscribe to standard bankroll management theory.
|
|
#39
11-06-2006, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
Once upon a time, before the internet poker nerd was born when playing poker meant driving to a casino or finding a home game, a 200 BB bankroll was considered sufficient for LHE. [/ QUOTE ] That's true. It was also considered normal for a pro to go broke several times in his or her career. Weirdly nobody made the connection. Guy.
|
|
#40
11-06-2006, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: scarytiger busto?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] lol scary tiger plays 100-200 and 200-400 on a 65K bankroll? is that just his online money or something? [/ QUOTE ] Once upon a time, before the internet poker nerd was born when playing poker meant driving to a casino or finding a home game, a 200 BB bankroll was considered sufficient for LHE. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but live: (1) Is full ring (2) Involves tells, which kills variance
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
