Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-01-2006, 07:59 AM
Zeke Yeehaw Zeke Yeehaw is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of so

Chart makes a lot of sense, in that as people's range grow, 99 has a much better shot at beating their improved hands than AK, as AK more often needs help from the community cards in order to beat them.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-01-2006, 08:03 AM
futuredoc85 futuredoc85 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 9,014
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of so

[ QUOTE ]
Chart makes a lot of sense, in that as people's range grow, 99 has a much better shot at beating their improved hands than AK, as AK more often needs help from the community cards in order to beat them.

[/ QUOTE ]

you're right but you're thinking too hard. simpler= AK vs Q6 is ~60/40 , 99 vs Q6 is ~70/30
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-01-2006, 09:36 AM
mackthefork mackthefork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK of A
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of so

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Chart makes a lot of sense, in that as people's range grow, 99 has a much better shot at beating their improved hands than AK, as AK more often needs help from the community cards in order to beat them.

[/ QUOTE ]

you're right but you're thinking too hard. simpler= AK vs Q6 is ~60/40 , 99 vs Q6 is ~70/30

[/ QUOTE ]

Works the same with 66 obviously from a lower base, Ako is pretty much the same against 40% as 100%.

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre> Range 99 Improve 66 Improve Definition

5% 35.9 33.6 88+,AJs+,KQs,AKo
10% 47.0 11.1 41.6 8.0 77+,A9s+,KTs+,QTs+,AJo+,KQo
15% 51.3 4.3 44.6 3.0 77+,A7s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KTo+,QJo
20% 54.0 2.7 47.0 2.4 66+,A4s+,K8s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s,A9o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo
25% 56.9 2.9 48.7 1.7 66+,A2s+,K6s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T8s+,A7o+,K9o+,QTo+,JTo
30% 58.6 1.7 50.5 1.8 55+,A2s+,K5s+,Q7s+,J8s+,T8s+,98s,A7o+,A5o,K9o+,Q9o +,J9o+,T9o
35% 60.5 1.9 51.8 1.3 55+,A2s+,K3s+,Q6s+,J7s+,T7s+,97s+,87s,A4o+,K8o+,Q9 o+,J9o+,T9o
40% 62.0 1.5 53.1 1.3 44+,A2s+,K2s+,Q4s+,J7s+,T7s+,97s+,87s,A3o+,K7o+,Q8 o+,J8o+,T9o
45% 63.3 1.3 53.8 0.7 44+,A2s+,K2s+,Q4s+,J6s+,T6s+,96s+,86s+,76s,A2o+,K6 o+,Q8o+,J8o+,T8o+,98o
50% 64.2 0.9 54.8 1.0 33+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J4s+,T6s+,96s+,86s+,76s,65s,A2o +,K5o+,Q7o+,J7o+,T7o+,98o
55% 65.3 1.1 55.5 0.7 33+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J3s+,T5s+,95s+,85s+,75s+,65s,A2 o+,K4o+,Q6o+,J7o+,T7o+,97o+,87o
60% 66.0 0.7 56.6 1.1 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T3s+,95s+,85s+,75s+,64s+,5 4s,A2o+,K2o+,Q5o+,J7o+,T7o+,97o+,87o
65% 67.1 1.1 57.4 0.8 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,94s+,84s+,74s+,64s+,5 4s,A2o+,K2o+,Q4o+,J6o+,T7o+,97o+,86o+,76o
70% 67.6 0.5 58.2 0.8 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,93s+,84s+,74s+,63s+,5 3s+,43s,A2o+,K2o+,Q3o+,J5o+,T6o+,96o+,86o+,76o
75% 68.4 0.8 59.1 0.9 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,83s+,73s+,63s+,5 2s+,43s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J4o+,T6o+,96o+,86o+,75o+,65 o
80% 69.1 0.7 60.0 0.9 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,73s+,62s+,5 2s+,43s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J3o+,T5o+,95o+,85o+,75o+,65 o,54o
85% 69.6 0.5 60.7 0.7 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,72s+,62s+,5 2s+,42s+,32s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J2o+,T3o+,95o+,85o+,74 o+,64o+,54o
90% 70.4 0.8 61.5 0.8 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,72s+,62s+,5 2s+,42s+,32s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J2o+,T2o+,93o+,84o+,74 o+,64o+,53o+
95% 71.1 0.7 62.2 0.7 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,72s+,62s+,5 2s+,42s+,32s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J2o+,T2o+,92o+,83o+,73 o+,63o+,52o+,43o
100% 72.1 1.0 63.3 1.1 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,82s+,72s+,62s+,5 2s+,42s+,32s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J2o+,T2o+,92o+,82o+,72 o+,62o+,52o+,42o+,32o
</pre><hr />

Mack
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-01-2006, 02:01 PM
z32fanatic z32fanatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Feb, March, April, May FTP SNG Leaderboard Champ
Posts: 1,674
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of so

Without reading the responses, I'm 99% sure I was the villain and wanted you to fold this hand [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

I think it's probably a call vs. 100%, but probably a fold vs. 85%.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-01-2006, 02:38 PM
alanbrown alanbrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 290
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of so

OK. Pull out the SNGPT and tell us the answer. I'd like to hear exact $EV difference for calling and folding with 99 or AK against 100% and 75% range.

I'm particularly interested in the 100% range as I've written a tool to do what sngpt does and I'm interested in QAing it with this test vector. My tool will calculate the exact difference in expected prize equity between calling and folding. I assume SNGPT does the same. It might differ on the 75% range if we don't share the same idea of hand ordering
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-01-2006, 03:34 PM
StregaChess StregaChess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Support Ron Paul for President
Posts: 1,096
Default Re: Another bubble call (no SNGPT peeking) - a closed book quiz of sorts

Having wasted a lot of time this month doing bubble training crap... So the first thoughts that jumped into my mind without thinking about it...

"fold" "fold"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.