|
|
#31
10-25-2006, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Too much of a good thing
[ QUOTE ]
Explain how. Site A makes the claim that their cards are dealt in a random fashion. I take a sample of the hands dealt, and see if that sample shows a random distribution or not. If the cards come up as often as they should statistically, then the site's claim is reliable. If not, then we should look into why it's not. Explain why this isn't a good way to test your claim vs. their claim. [/ QUOTE ] I'll assume your interest is sincere. Please follow this closely. THe site wishes to favor new players (NP). It deals 100% random pocket cards and all flops as well. On hands where NP is taking the turn, the site looks at the next 3 possible turn cards and puts out the one most favorable for (NP). Repeat on the river if needed. Now NP will not win every hand but you can easily see how much more often he might win. Also all the T&R cards have a very large measure of 'randomness'. Clearly they are not random. Your job is to design an experiment that can find this very weak signal in all the random noise. It's a near to impossible task. Hint: Examine the code. |
|
#32
10-25-2006, 06:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too much of a good thing
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Explain how. Site A makes the claim that their cards are dealt in a random fashion. I take a sample of the hands dealt, and see if that sample shows a random distribution or not. If the cards come up as often as they should statistically, then the site's claim is reliable. If not, then we should look into why it's not. Explain why this isn't a good way to test your claim vs. their claim. [/ QUOTE ] I'll assume your interest is sincere. Please follow this closely. THe site wishes to favor new players (NP). It deals 100% random pocket cards and all flops as well. On hands where NP is taking the turn, the site looks at the next 3 possible turn cards and puts out the one most favorable for (NP). Repeat on the river if needed. Now NP will not win every hand but you can easily see how much more often he might win. Also all the T&R cards have a very large measure of 'randomness'. Clearly they are not random. Your job is to design an experiment that can find this very weak signal in all the random noise. It's a near to impossible task. Hint: Examine the code. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#34
10-25-2006, 07:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Too much of a good thing
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] This kind of ridiculous crap was debunked in 2001, could you come up with some other ridicuous crap to keep things interesting please. Thanks in advance. Lori [/ QUOTE ] Once you've seen (and understand) the underlying code and then seen it compiled and you're 110% sure that its in operation THEN you can assume honesty at a site. Short of that you've got feeeeelings, nothing more than feeeeelings.... [/ QUOTE ] I was totaly with you man, but you lost me with the feeeeelings. Can you explain how exactly feeeeelings differ from feelings? I see you took care to add exactly 3 e's, coincidence? I think not! |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
