Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:04 PM
You're No Daisy You're No Daisy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pinning the tail on the donkey
Posts: 482
Default Re: Ak with 47 BB Mega Pot

Python,

After UTG+1 3-bets you, just what exactly do you think he's holding? I'll give you one guess. If he did this with KK, he's a fool, but still has you beat on every street. I doubt anyone would limp/3-bet QQ. Preflop you're fine. When the flop comes out you need to check/fold. AK is great preflop, but against that many opponents on the flop and you not getting a piece of it, you're done with the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:06 PM
You're No Daisy You're No Daisy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pinning the tail on the donkey
Posts: 482
Default Re: Ak with 47 BB Mega Pot

[ QUOTE ]
Flop and turn are atrocities against poker. River bet is marginal. But hey, you got preflop right!

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah...what he said!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-19-2006, 12:26 PM
RemyXO RemyXO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Saving Fuzzy Kittens
Posts: 1,112
Default Re: Ak with 47 BB Mega Pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How would you play a hand with infinity pod odds against almost all oppenents to max. your profit?

[/ QUOTE ]

What?

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought you only get infinite pot odds when you take a free card [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I.e. the denominator bet size is zero.

PS: Alizee digs me
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-19-2006, 07:13 PM
drzen drzen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Donkeytown
Posts: 2,704
Default Re: Ak with 47 BB Mega Pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hm, ok, he probably holds a very big pocket pair.

[/ QUOTE ]

Right, UTG+1 almost always has AA or (more rarely) KK here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually no, I don't think he does. I haven't seen that many LRRs in limit but when I have, they have often been suited cards looking to make a big pot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Our experiences do not match. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough. I am going to enjoy the benefit of your experience by weighting it more heavily to big pairs from now on, because I daresay you have a lot more hands in than I do.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't be so sure of that, drzen. You've been registered longer than I have and also have more posts. Why would I have more hands than you? I've only played about 30K so far. Maybe I'm the one who should defer to you!

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. I have barely played in the past couple of months and I haven't played anything like as many hands as you altogether.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.