Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 01-22-2006, 05:46 PM
Greg Miller Greg Miller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 236
Default Re: Party and Stars 3/6 6-max rake in BB/100

[ QUOTE ]
duh, but I don't see an auto-import for stars, just party, prima/skins, proom/skins, full tilt, crypto, and pacific. So, I'm a bit confused

[/ QUOTE ]

There wasn't a special option for Stars until recently. Download a newer patch.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-22-2006, 05:57 PM
Greg Miller Greg Miller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 236
Default Re: Party and Stars 3/6 6-max rake in BB/100

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Even without all those considerations aobut pot size, the fact that Party players suck horribly at this level defenetely overcomes the difference in rake.

[/ QUOTE ]

The players at stars seem worse than they used to be. How can you so confidently say that the Party players are still so much worse as to overcome the rake difference?

[/ QUOTE ]

It'll be interesting to see what happens when/if the Cassava deal goes through. They've had a lot of success getting fishy players from their casino to play at Pacific. Imagine Stars with these same folks!

Of course, the danger is that they might screw up Stars by fixing what isn't broke. Higher rake schedules, failure to maintain the software, ignoring collusion, etc. They haven't done a good job with Pacific.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.