Re-Randing

[Nicholasp27]

right; but not if it's a random method that is just not truly random...ie flawed method; no knowledge of players

[lastchance]

Traz is just being lazy.

Obviously, his rand isn't perfect, (because of his subconscious).

Actually, I'm probably going to avoid IMing traz to mod my turbos.

[CPFB]

this is a loopy argument

[lastchance]

Also, deliberately reranding = cherry picking, DYSW?

[Nicholasp27]

yeah, non-perfect rands are fine

it's when u know the players that matters

[BluffBlank]

i guess it would be fine as long as the players truly believed you were being random, right? then it wouldn't affect the meta-game.

[kokiri]

a flawed RNG, such as picking numbers in your head, is not perfect but unlikely to do any real harm.

If I knew people were reranding, or picking who you feel like, it would impact the game in my view pretty much to the extent I wouldn't want to play. And if I don't know, that's just like the waiter pissing in my soup.

[Boiler_bd]

re-randing to get a "better" game is unfair to the players. If someone just picks people seemingly at random that's fine, although pure rand is better.

If I know someone did not use rand then I can probably find a few wolf matchups that are less likely to occur, all newb wolf team for instance.

[clowntable]

wow, this happens?

[BluffBlank]

[ QUOTE ]
wow, this happens?

[/ QUOTE ]

see, now it's not ok to rerand, since now people know you do it :-)