#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 2)
The Chiefs suck, no doubt, and I have to be a fan so it really sucks for me. But as bad as they are, they were about 2 plays away from beating the Bears in Chicago. I would say the Chiefs are better than Buffalo, maybe Miami and Cleveland. I guess it doesn't really matter how you rank the horrible teams, eh.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 2)
[ QUOTE ]
That said, Pittsburgh has been miles better than anyone expected (and I don't think most people expected them to miss the playoffs). They look really, really good right now and even playing the easy part of the schedule, two 20+ point wins for a team that was expected to be good already should have them at least 3. [/ QUOTE ] ORLY? http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/previe...ory?id=2984130 Though FO liked them. I thought they'd be good. Certainly better than 25-1 to win the SB, which I got them for in August. They're now down to 18-1. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sluss\'s 2007 AFC Rankings (Week 2)
Eh.. Well, ESPN are morans.
FO did like them. Vegas actually thought they would be out (so eh.. I'm wrong there), but the O/U on Pittsburgh is 9 wins, just behind Balt/Den/Cincy. Eh.. Yeah, I think they're pretty good. |
|
|