|
|
#33
07-19-2007, 01:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
[ QUOTE ]
FTP has pretty easy HU cash games from what I've heard, but I imagine Stars HU would be even easier. [/ QUOTE ] this doesnt make any sense also my response that ftp hu tables are uncapped at .5/1-10/20 was, i thought rather obviously, in response to Stars claim of 'squatting' as a reason that they could not implement HU tables. 
|
|
#36
07-19-2007, 01:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
[ QUOTE ]
Its simple, Stars wont cater to their players as much as Full Tilt will, this will ultimately keep losing customers and they will suffer a little less profit for being idiots [/ QUOTE ] I dunno about this.
|
|
#37
07-19-2007, 02:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] FTP has pretty easy HU cash games from what I've heard, but I imagine Stars HU would be even easier. [/ QUOTE ] this doesnt make any sense [/ QUOTE ] what [/ QUOTE ] what's so hard to understand? you made a completely unsubstantiated statement and expect it to be taken as truth. why would stars HU games be easier than FTP games, which you apprarently have not played either?
|
|
#38
07-19-2007, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] FTP has pretty easy HU cash games from what I've heard, but I imagine Stars HU would be even easier. [/ QUOTE ] this doesnt make any sense [/ QUOTE ] what [/ QUOTE ] what's so hard to understand? you made a completely unsubstantiated statement and expect it to be taken as truth. why would stars HU games be easier than FTP games, which you apprarently have not played either? [/ QUOTE ] Because stars is an easier site. If people can be playing HU cash on Fulltilt with 27% rakeback, and they are still hoping Stars opens HU cash games again, then obviously the games would be substantially easier.
|
|
#39
07-19-2007, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
Probably for two reasons:
A) A lot of people play their main game on Stars so their br is on there. B) FPPs can actually amount to a lot of rakeback if used properly/VIP levels achieved are high enough. There's threads on this in Internet Gambling I believe. Also different games are going to be easier on different sites, I don't believe there is a blanket statement that would be correct either way about the overall quality of play on these sites.
|
|
#40
07-19-2007, 03:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL Cash Heads up at Pokerstars?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] FTP has pretty easy HU cash games from what I've heard, but I imagine Stars HU would be even easier. [/ QUOTE ] this doesnt make any sense [/ QUOTE ] what [/ QUOTE ] what's so hard to understand? you made a completely unsubstantiated statement and expect it to be taken as truth. why would stars HU games be easier than FTP games, which you apprarently have not played either? [/ QUOTE ] Because stars is an easier site. If people can be playing HU cash on Fulltilt with 27% rakeback, and they are still hoping Stars opens HU cash games again, then obviously the games would be substantially easier. [/ QUOTE ] wtf. how can you say that stars is an 'easier' site? what does that even mean? you are good at backing up unsubstantiated comments with more of the same. how exactly are you defining easier? is it avg vpip? i could show you datamined samples over a 3month period where ftp 3/6 and 5/10nl 6max is looser on average than the same games on stars. please dont come in here talking about that which you nothing.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
