#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
Oh right I remember that monkey mail [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Since its common knowledge its Chantel. -DeathDonkey [/ QUOTE ] I'm under impression various people play on it these days. [/ QUOTE ] This would explain a lot. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
sometimes this is a super easy vbet for me. im unbeatable at these times. rare.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
not that I'm aware of. Letting somebody else play on your account is evidently okay I think. YOU have more than one account of your own is not allowed though. I believe they have specifically said that they allow letting others play on your account because there really isn't anything they can do to prevent it. My memory might be off about this one though. [/ QUOTE ] this is incorrect they banned neverwin for 3 months or something and temp banned anyone who they thought might have let him play on their account for a few days while investigating they have made their stance here pretty clear recently |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Observer Q about Papawarbucks hand 200/400
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It was definitely a valuebet. [/ QUOTE ] already knew that, but why did you think betting had more value than inducing. because it looked like he had exactly KQ/KJ type hands? [/ QUOTE ] its thin, but i see why he would do this.. you're also underestimating the fold equity. schneids reads souls |
|
|